Page 1 of 1

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2002 10:34 am
by gygus
comments please...
why is not this MoBo as good as a7n266-c?
is a7n266-vm suitable for pulsar??

Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2002 12:28 pm
by dehuszar
The VM board has only 3 PCI slots. IT's a micro-ATX board. I'm pretty sure it also lacks the onboard sound, but I'm not sure. If you were building a system with only 3 Creamware boards & nothing else, it might work out for you, providing you've found a VM board with Ethernet, on-board audio, and video. Although I think it might have an AGP port. ...can't remember.

Hope that helps,
Sam

Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2002 7:42 am
by gygus
I mean: my problem is with the chip the VM has the 220d instead the C has the 415.
I'd like to know if it's true that the 220d doesn't work well with CW cards and why...

thanx

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2002 3:59 pm
by Privatny
Now I really haven't got an idea what I'm talking about here, but as I remember, the 220 chip hasn't got the "double speed" connection to RAM that the 415/420 has. And that can't be good for anything I'd say :smile:
Check it out at Tomshardware, I forgot the details...