PlanetZ forums - scopeusers.com

New DAW based on scope dsp

many functions of a sequencer such as midi processing, file handling and graphics display are better off left on the CPU.

For now i work with Cubase but i try Reaper and i'm really impressed , Great seq. i think is my next daw

[many functions of a sequencer such as midi processing, file handling and graphics display are better off left on the CPU.]

..maybe, but if i write where Scope need improvment to go to next level i write this:

1- Stability (now i work fine but freeze problem not solved 100%)
2- Internal Seq.
3- Better support

IMO

P.S. maybe it's idea for another post: Write 3 area where you think scope need improvment to go to next level
P.P.S. sorry for English

Gine LBH VIII a look-see here.

http://www.spacef-devices.com/VIDEOS-B/ ... ercent.jpg

there can never be an 'internal' sequencer because DSPs cannot handle file IO and all that stuff.
Btw half of Scope is running on the CPU anyway

cheers, Tom

stardust wrote:In other words:
Also ProTools has 'only' a native sequencer integrated with the DSP cards functions.

I assume thats what was meant

Yes BINGO!! ..but only a dream

I own Cubase SX3: it's lot of work to really get proper hardware integration working into it. Only a small few devices are referenced in Midi machines. For the others you have that are not listed in stock presets, you're up for some painful Sysex programming!
I don't know about Cubase 4 however. I only heard rumours it's no better in 4.0.0 than in SX3.