has anyone built a cheap baby ATX daw for VSTi?
- kensuguro
- Posts: 4434
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: BPM 60 to somewhere around 150
- Contact:
has anyone built a cheap baby ATX daw for VSTi?
Just wondering if anyone's done a cheap, simple box just as a VSTi companion for scope? AMD dual cores seem darn cheap, so I was thinking of putting together a near dedicated kontakt box with small OS disk, and another disk for samples. Seems like I might be able to pull it off way under $1000. And then I'll just slap on a cheap M-audio interface. It's not for gigging or anything, just to use big piano libraries on kontakt when I practice.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 6:05 pm
Re: has anyone built a cheap baby ATX daw for VSTi?
Yep.kensuguro wrote:Just wondering if anyone's done a cheap, simple box just as a VSTi companion for scope? AMD dual cores seem darn cheap, so I was thinking of putting together a near dedicated kontakt box with small OS disk, and another disk for samples. Seems like I might be able to pull it off way under $1000. And then I'll just slap on a cheap M-audio interface. It's not for gigging or anything, just to use big piano libraries on kontakt when I practice.
Antec Aria case (Now called NSK1380 - no longer has builtin card reader)
Gigabyte GA-M61PM-S2 MicroATX mobo - discontinued -
AMD A64x2 4600+
Mixtreme Classic - discontinued
2 X Hitachi HDD
Multi-format Card Reader
Great little box - I use it as a backup for the rackmount, which is now being rebuilt.
Just play!
- Nestor
- Posts: 6688
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: Fourth Dimension Paradise, Cloud Nine!
The benchmarks are quite specific and tend to measure odd aspects of CPUs sometimes, and yes, we all want the fastest CPU available in the market and all that. But I can assure you that an Atlhon Dualcore is not to be disregarded if the only thing you want to do is to run a few heavy load VSTi. It should be more than enough, particularly if you plan to install a reduced XP version of Windows. My only concern about it is the need for high quality fans so to keep your box cool enough, as Atlhons get quite hot when working hard for long periods of time.
The amount of money you save is so much, that makes of it a wise choice.
The amount of money you save is so much, that makes of it a wise choice.
*MUSIC* The most Powerful Language in the world! *INDEED*
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 6:05 pm
Absolutely true.Nestor wrote:The benchmarks are quite specific and tend to measure odd aspects of CPUs sometimes, and yes, we all want the fastest CPU available in the market and all that. But I can assure you that an Atlhon Dualcore is not to be disregarded if the only thing you want to do is to run a few heavy load VSTi. It should be more than enough, particularly if you plan to install a reduced XP version of Windows...
I can tell you this is absolutely NOT the case with my A64x2 4600+. This 65watt Windsor cpu runs quite cool for extended periods of time.Nestor wrote:.... My only concern about it is the need for high quality fans so to keep your box cool enough, as Atlhons get quite hot when working hard for long periods of time......
A wise choice indeed.Nestor wrote:...The amount of money you save is so much, that makes of it a wise choice.
Just play!