CPU L2 cache

PC Configurations, motherboards, etc, etc

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
Cochise
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:00 pm

Post by Cochise »

I've just read this on a magazine:

verify XP is correctly using L2 cache;

the key SecondLevelDataCache in the pathHKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESYSTEMCurrentControlSetControlSession ManagerMemory Management of the registry, has to be set to values of 200 for 512KB L2 cache processors, 400 for 1MB.

It was set to 0 here.
User avatar
valis
Posts: 7680
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: West Coast USA
Contact:

Post by valis »

Cochise
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:00 pm

Post by Cochise »

Right. Seems to be a useless tweak.
With 0 value the OS get L2 cache amount from the HAL...
But I can't find any OS report about L2 cache amount...
User avatar
valis
Posts: 7680
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: West Coast USA
Contact:

Post by valis »

Search MSDN & find out what the call is to request L2 cache size. I used to use this tweak years ago (I actually had a dual p133 board with scsi onboard) and I recall with NT4 & My dual P2 xeons it was no longer necessary. I also recall that the only thing it seemed to affect was the OS, Softimage and Photoshop were able to query the cpu directly,. I would hazard a guess that many audio apps do the same, especially with MS's byzantine labyrinth of system calls in WinXP.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: valis on 2005-09-26 18:12 ]</font>
Cochise
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:00 pm

Post by Cochise »

The OS could succeed in retrieving that data if a P4 is in use.
Post Reply