Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 2:55 pm
I'm planning to buy three monitors that I'm going to run in 1600x1200 resolution (Samsung 213T), and I wonder if that will require much of the CPU capacity? I'm using the CPU for all my synths (ie. VSTis), and I'm not using any hardware synths. That's why I'm a little bit worried that driving the three monitors will use too much of the
CPU capacity.
I am thinking of having the CubaseSX workspace on one monitor, the VSTis on the second monitor and the Pulsar 2448 mixer on the third monitor (plus some CW synths). The reason that I'm planning to buy three monitors is that the 21" monitors are much cheaper than the 30" and therefore it seems to be a better deal to buy three 21" monitors than one 30".
Have anyone of you got some experience to share about CPU performance and multiple monitors?
Also, will a TV-card require much of the CPU performance? It is always nice to have the possibility to look at the TV meanwhile improvising some melodies.
The computer that I'm using is a P4-2.4HGz, 1 GB ram, Pulsar2. The gfx-card that I'm planning to buy is the Matrox Qid.
CPU capacity.
I am thinking of having the CubaseSX workspace on one monitor, the VSTis on the second monitor and the Pulsar 2448 mixer on the third monitor (plus some CW synths). The reason that I'm planning to buy three monitors is that the 21" monitors are much cheaper than the 30" and therefore it seems to be a better deal to buy three 21" monitors than one 30".
Have anyone of you got some experience to share about CPU performance and multiple monitors?
Also, will a TV-card require much of the CPU performance? It is always nice to have the possibility to look at the TV meanwhile improvising some melodies.
The computer that I'm using is a P4-2.4HGz, 1 GB ram, Pulsar2. The gfx-card that I'm planning to buy is the Matrox Qid.