Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:58 pm
by braincell
sometimes I just want to play without being constrained by a metronome. What tempo should Cubase be? If I make it really fast it would be more accurate right? Is there a down side to this? Could it use more CPU that way? I have always wondered ahbout this.
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 10:05 pm
by hubird
On 2004-12-16 20:58, braincell wrote:
If I make it really fast it would be more accurate right?
more accurate to what?
are you talking about recording midi notes? or audio?
I don't get it really
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 4:15 am
by fra77x
When i record midi notes with my axon midi guitar (6 channel midi data) i find it best to record at a slow tempo while playing slow... Then i raise the tempo. In general it doesn't make any difference
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 4:52 am
by alfonso
Given a midi resolution, obviously a faster tempo is theorically more accurate, as much as this term can stretched to fit the midi protocol....
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 1:13 pm
by next to nothing
BPM tempo wont do too muvh difference, as lon as quantizising is turned off.
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 1:44 pm
by braincell
Hubrid, I meant MIDI.
Alfonso, that's what I figure.
I think internal synths can perform better than external, yes? I mean without the special midi interface steinberg for cubase and emagic for logic. I have emagic but with cubase so I don't get the increased midi speed.
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 4:01 pm
by at0m
It's not faster like that, it's actually slower. Like PDC (Plugin Delay Compensation) delays audio trakcs to match up with the slowest ones.
You don't need to set higher bpm, set a higher MIDI resolution (PPQN) instead.