MIDI Device To stabilize the Clock between the VST host and

Request a new device/modular module, and hope that some enterprising developer grants your wish!

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
genoxcide
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by genoxcide »

I would be really appreciated if somewone could constuct such a plugin so that i can use the BPM of the Hostsequencer synced with the several plugins from CW as sort of a "MIDI-Stabilizer" would that be possible or even exist something like that


Cheerz,
GenocidE

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: genoxcide on 2004-04-20 08:58 ]</font>
samplaire
Posts: 2464
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Warsaw to Szczecin, Poland
Contact:

Post by samplaire »

That would be great! Like something in pocket film cameras!
Yeah, this would be great to have a sabilized clock (more or less) because some arpeggiator or step sequencer parts NEED to be tight in time :smile:

_________________
Sir Sam Plaire Scopernicus

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: samplaire on 2004-04-20 08:05 ]</font>
User avatar
kensuguro
Posts: 4434
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: BPM 60 to somewhere around 150
Contact:

Post by kensuguro »

I'm still wondering why these things can't keep with the sequencer's clock.. can someone remind me why they couldn't?
samplaire
Posts: 2464
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Warsaw to Szczecin, Poland
Contact:

Post by samplaire »

It's midi problem. I once tried to sync my computer sequencer to my Korg EA1 clock (people say HW sequencers have more stable clock) but my computer received a "more or less" clock (for instance once it was 120.1 and in a while it was 119.9 etc.) which of course was usless in my loop world :sad:

So I think it's just midi.
User avatar
kensuguro
Posts: 4434
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: BPM 60 to somewhere around 150
Contact:

Post by kensuguro »

aw man, then MIDI sucks. lol.
We'd all be so old by the time people come up with a new MIDI standard that actually works....
User avatar
braincell
Posts: 5943
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Washington DC

Post by braincell »

It's a miracle they agreed on the first standard. It really needs to be updated in many ways. I was thinking for hardware one cable should carry MIDI and Audio in and out, or better yet be wireless. The new wireless midi/audio standard!
Thalamus
Posts: 393
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Denmark (yes, we do have nice blondes)
Contact:

Post by Thalamus »

I really think yamaha MLAN is the near future of upgrading the MIDI/AUDIO I/Os on instruments. But for it to be great more companies should implement it. May be done even wireless maybe, but I think there is some signal lost in the process
Yours truely

Noah Laux
----------
http://www.thalamus.dk
8-Bit
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Humboldt County, California
Contact:

Post by 8-Bit »

Yeh.. The midi/audio thing can all be done with USB and Firewire cabling... This is becoming pretty prominent in the midi controller market nowadays. I think its a good thing, but I hope they still keep old-school midi cabling in the loop for the next 5 years or more

8
samplaire
Posts: 2464
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Warsaw to Szczecin, Poland
Contact:

Post by samplaire »

It's difficult in the world of every-company-wants-its-own-standard to make an agreement. Look at the tv world - the high definition tv is on the table since at least 15 years and nothing really revolutionary happened to the world. The same was with VHS - there were more interesting options in the past like home Beta or Video2000. Why the worst of the 3 won? Because JVC gave the licence for free to the people. But it doesn't mean JVC won. Like IBM and its PC. How many PCs do they sell? I think there are companies that sell larger amounts of PCs although IBM invented it. That's Microsoft won because every PC needs DOS or Windows.
User avatar
valis
Posts: 7649
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: West Coast USA
Contact:

Post by valis »

IBM actually recently sold its PC division to a Japanese PC maker that's relatively unknown as a brand name.
Post Reply