Creamware platform is great

Jem · Post by **Jem** » Tue Jan 13, 2004 7:11 pm

Just wanted to say that in the business Creamware has probably the best price value gear available (actually very cheap).

If you are used to work with hardware Creamware transfers exact hardware machine copies into virtual options. YOu need to know how a Vdat works just get an Adat manual and you can read how tom operate. Want to know how to handle the 2448 4896 mixers just get the sony manual of the orginal hardware table and you know what to do etc. etc..

I just hope they will bring out SFP 4 so we can use the mackie control for the mixer and other devices.

Keep it up Creamware.

Immanuel · Post by **Immanuel** » Tue Jan 13, 2004 7:55 pm

Yet another thread of praising?
Well why not.
You are after all right, that buying a Creamware card is a tremendous deal with the huge amount of high quality "software", that comes with.

scary808 · Post by **scary808** » Wed Jan 14, 2004 4:47 pm

On 2004-01-13 19:11, Jem wrote:
Want to know how to handle the 2448 4896 mixers just get the sony manual of the orginal hardware table and you know what to do etc. etc...

Very true! The 2448 doesn't get enough praise IMO. It's based on the Sony DMX R100 (which also uses Sharcs) but it's much easier to use. I think the current price of the DMX R100 is around $9,000.00 which is half of it's original retail price but if you do the math...

buyakasha · Post by **buyakasha** » Tue Jan 20, 2004 5:14 pm

Let me get on the train here. I've just traded in my 2 Pulsar II cards, my Yamaha 02R and other outboard gear for 2 Powerpulsar cards with Z/link, a second A16 Ultra and a Mackie Control. ( I worked hard last year and treated myself to the best Xmas present I could give me)

I also believe the STM2448 does not get the respect it deserves. and like Jem says, I would also like to see a direct implementation of the Mackie Control.
(As I have one, I actually can't wait)

So Once again People, Biggit up for the Creamware Massives, Aiiiiiieeeee.

Next Stop. SFP4

R-type · Post by **R-type** » Wed Jan 21, 2004 4:46 am

Yes it is very cool. It does such a massive range of things you truly have to experience it to understand.

I honestly could not have dreamed a better audio card option and for the money it leaves all in the dust.

wayne · Post by **wayne** » Wed Jan 21, 2004 5:00 am

I'm right with it!

best bang for buck i could imagine.

paulrmartin · Post by **paulrmartin** » Wed Jan 21, 2004 8:24 am

Here is the DMX R100 manual , in case anybody id interested:

http://www.totalaudio.co.uk/r100dotcom/R100V2MAN.pdf

medway · Post by **medway** » Fri Jan 30, 2004 6:47 am

what do you guys like about the 2448 so much? how does it really compare to the sony ones? i doubt the eq section is as nice.

Jesse

thorkell · Post by **thorkell** » Fri Jan 30, 2004 8:15 am

I must admit i never got the hang of using 2448 especially the routing and sends. But the CW platform is the best for the bucks there is that's no question!

wayne · Post by **wayne** » Fri Jan 30, 2004 10:06 am

On 2004-01-30 06:47, medway wrote:
i doubt the eq section is as nice.

Jesse

perhaps it isn't, but one can choose from a multitude of different eq's on this platform.

i just like to use that desk, now that dsp allows - it's more like being in a normal recording session for me. Routing has endless possibilities, and i find the interface familiar & creative.

braincell · Post by **braincell** » Fri Jan 30, 2004 11:08 am

Does the 2448 sound any better than the 1624?
I always thought the 2448 should have been included in the SFP. There is so much software I would like to buy these days that I can't get everything I want. A bigger mixer is not at the top of my list. If It was around $50.00 I would buy it today for sure.

wayne · Post by **wayne** » Fri Jan 30, 2004 12:14 pm

i don't think it sounds better as such, but it does have those 48db filters...

braincell · Post by **braincell** » Fri Jan 30, 2004 2:30 pm

What do 48db filters do? Pardon my ignorance.