Review of MINIMAX published on Future Producers!

Planet Z Announcements

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
mano
Posts: 282
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by mano »

I hope you guys enjoy it :smile:

http://www.futureproducers.com/article.php/id/6

More reviews like this one are coming soon. I want to showcase the GREAT Creamware products as much as possible.. The quality is superb and it deserves to be seen by as many people as possible.

Best wishes to you guys and your families for 2004
And best wishes to Creamware!

Take care

-mano
roberflas
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: España

Post by roberflas »

This is agood art. about Minimax.
Thank you
Quifster
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 4:00 pm

Post by Quifster »

i really liked the article. it was fair and very good written. I agreed on every point brought up in the article. They reflect my thoughts about the minimax completely

Well Done !!!
soul-synthesis
Posts: 78
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Sydney, AUSTRALIA

Post by soul-synthesis »

very well written. two thumbs up!!
Joxer the Mighty
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2003 4:00 pm

Post by Joxer the Mighty »

I agree, very well written. Your excitement over Minimax really comes across. It reminded me of my experience when I first tried it out. :smile:
User avatar
braincell
Posts: 5943
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Washington DC

Post by braincell »

I understand that it sounds really fantastic but they could have added more features. Why does it have to be an exact copy?
Shayne White
Posts: 1454
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Post by Shayne White »

It isn't an exact copy, there's a whole "add" page with extended features that make the instrument a bit more practical for today's synthesists. But just in the original features alone there's enough to make it extremely useful. And fun! :grin:

Shayne
Melodious Synth Radio
http://www.melodious-synth.com

Melodious synth music by Binary Sea
http://www.binary-sea.com
User avatar
dehuszar
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Chicago, IL United States of Amnesia

Post by dehuszar »

Mano1, I really enjoyed that! However, I also have some constructive criticism if you'll take it.

While we all want to have good words about our platform about in the press, and as a reviewer of the product, coming from this community, it can look kinda bad if your orgiastically praising CW stuff. Granted, MiniMax is probably the most tonally successful synth plugin so far (anywhere) you still run the risk of being called a shill if you don't keep some professional distance when you praise the product and it's makers.

I think the fact that you explained your process of getting to know the synth with MP3's at each juncture was fairly watershed. I'm really surprised I haven't seen that in other online reviews before. And I think that level of detail gives more credibility to your praise of the product. Especially that filter sweep demo. Most MP3 review samples are very clinical and non-artistic. I really got juiced about the synth and pulled it out after hearing a couple of examples, tweaking to my hearts content.

Just try and keep your tone neutral until you're done with the background and exposition. Then when you discuss your hands on experiences, readers will be able to evaluate your investigation without necessarily knowing the punchline.

It doesn't hurt to give a brief summary of what your final opinion is at the start, but looking at this paragraph:

"Creamware, well known for their mighty-powerful hardware accelerated SCOPE Fusion Platform, are growing stronger and stronger each year. While innovative products such as NOAH put Creamware on the headlines of all the major music magazines this year, they also focused on developing several impressive devices for their DSP platforms."

You make CW to sound like an industry juggernaut that no one has noticed, but everyone knows that they are in financial trouble (regardless of the reason or their so-far favorable outcome).

People will read the review, see that you own the cards, and if they hold that emotional bias to CW (you all know how we have our emotionally binding snobbery about what products are good and what sucks) they'll think you made some dough off of your "review" and tune out.

It might be more effective to be honest about their financial problems (by which I mean forthcoming --and not to insinuate that you were being dishonest) and explain for the record what CW's stance is, and why they hit that point. Or provide a link to their official statements.

Remind people that Alesis is still around and doing good work. Then go into your experiences with MiniMax. That way, when readers get all the information, especially that which calmly, and without unnecessary adulation, addresses the rumors, outdated information, and general fears that people might be armed with when they come to your site, they might be better able to take away a more reasonable view to Creamware's position in the audio world.

Anyway, I hope that doesn't sound harsh. I thought it was a great piece. I just want to make sure we're as careful as possible about how we present ourselves to the non-CW world. (i.e. the unenlightened :razz: )

Sam
mano
Posts: 282
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by mano »

Well, I meant that products-wise things are getting better (stronger might not be the word there?).

I thought it would have been almost off-topic to do an expose on CW's financial situation... I dont think I know enough details not to confuse the situation even more :wink:

I am glad you liked the sound examples. I couldnt find any decent sound examples anywhere (as I said in the review) so I thought I'd just capture some tracks as I went, and end up with something kind of finished that only used the product by itself :smile: (let me know if you meant the contrary, I might not have understood your point :smile: )


I will definitely consider looking through the text to see if there is anything I should revise based on what you said.

Thanks for the great input.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: mano1.com on 2004-01-10 15:12 ]</font>
mano
Posts: 282
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by mano »

Yep, I see what you mean and I edited some of it, so it doesn't confuse people or - as you said - take away the credibility you felt throughout the rest of the review (thanks again for that).

I prefered not to envenimate things more about financial situations, especiallya s it probably changes monthly and this review will always be on the FP site.

Take care, thanks again for the input/feedback.
User avatar
dehuszar
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Chicago, IL United States of Amnesia

Post by dehuszar »

My pleasure. Keep 'em coming!

Sam
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8446
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by astroman »

yeah, that's the style of discussion I love planetZ for :smile:
thumbs up for both of you, Mano and Sam !

cheers, Tom
User avatar
Nestor
Posts: 6683
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Fourth Dimension Paradise, Cloud Nine!

Post by Nestor »

Very nice review, and good for Creamweare, they deseve it, as all of those who work hard to get it! :smile: Congratilations Creamweare.
mano
Posts: 282
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by mano »

Quick update!

I added a new part to the review, about routing the MInimax's output back to the input. I posted an MP3 file I captured while I was tweaking the beast :wink: rummmbbllllinngggg

Scroll down towards the end, above the DSP usage part.

Thanks for the support

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: mano1.com on 2004-01-23 01:35 ]</font>
Post Reply