Unexpected DSP overload again...

An area for people to discuss Scope related problems, issues, etc.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
batfink
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 4:00 pm

Post by batfink »

Hi
I am running a Power Pulsar (PCI slot 3) above a Pulsar 2 (PCI slot 4), which I believe is the correct order in which to fit the cards (largest first). They are sharing the same IRQ etc and all other aspects of my system are working fine.
<p>
However I do occasionally get the 'unexpected DSP overload' message even when using modest SFP resources (30%). I have read similar posts to this one:
<p>
http://www.planetz.com/forums/viewtopic ... 09&forum=1
<p>
and would like to know how I might change the order of the cards within the cset.ini file. This file currently tells me (under [Host-Config]) that Numboards=1 and that Board0=Host. Is it right that changing the order of these entries can solve this problem?
<p>
Thanks!
marcuspocus
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Canada/France

Post by marcuspocus »

Yeah, seems right to me.

But, how about temperature inside?

I found that those cards generate alot of heat, and using 2 cards even more. STDM communications seems sensitive to this. Also loading big module at startup, like the STM2448 can cause this sometimes. Maybe ligthen up abit the startup project?

Just some ideas...
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23364
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Post by garyb »

heat is always a possible source of unexplained problems...
User avatar
interloper
Posts: 370
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: amsterdam
Contact:

Post by interloper »

How many cables do you have?
batfink
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 4:00 pm

Post by batfink »

Hi
Thanks for replies everyone. m/b temp is 30 and processor never exceeds 50 (6 fans) so heat probably not the problem.
<p>
Anyone know which part of the cset.ini file I (may) need to change??

Thanks

[Also: I run my cards in XTC mode and use the default XTCProject.pro file]
Post Reply