ECC83 Tube Filter v0.7 ... Now with Presets !!

Scope device files created using the Scope SDK

Moderators: valis, garyb

rodos1979
Posts: 736
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Greece

Post by rodos1979 »

Ok.. I did some thorough testing and have these new (as accurate as possible) results:

PEAK(in dB) / RMS avg(in dB) / DC offset(percentage)

0 / -4.78 / 0.4
-5.03 / -6.19 / 1.46

-0.5 / -5.26 / 0.12
-5.03 / -6.27 / 1.25

-1 / -5.78 / 0.05
-5.03 / -6.35 / 1.15

-2 / -6.77 / 0.16
-5.03 / -6.54 / 1.13

-3 / -7.78 / 0.07
-5.03 / -6.77 / 0.91

-4 / -8.76 / 0
-5.03 / -7.04 / 0.67

-5 / -9.76 / 0.13
-5.03 / -7.35 / 0.69

-6 / -10.77 / 0.01
-5.03 / -7.75 / 0.46

-8 / -12.75 / 0.14
-5.03 / -8.85 / 0.27

-10 / -14.77 / 0.25
-5.04 / -10.57 / 0.08

-12 / -16.76 / -0.2
-6.84 / -12.46 / -0.05

-15 / -19.78 / -0.29
-9.61 / -15.44 / -0.12

-20 / -24.77 / -0.05
-14.66 / -20.41 / -0.04

First line is the original recording of White Noise and second line of each group is the processed one. I use samples of white noise made by Soundforge 8.

I know it is difficult to read the test results like this.. I ve tried to make them more spaced by using "tab", but again the formatting is getting lost.

If one could enter them in excel and make some calculations, things would be a lot clearer...

As I said, I like what Tube Warmer does to the sound if the sound peaks at -5db.. if it is peaking more, I get an easily perceivable distortion, which to my ears doesn't sound good...

I have the suspicion that what I hear is pure digital distortion, and there is a hard limiter that limits the output signal to -5.03dB no matter what..
I think Tube Warmer should be calibrated so that this hard limit should be at -0.1dB. So that even when you feed it a 0dB signal, it doesn't distort...

What do you think?

P.S. I ve attached a .doc with the test results
Attachments
tube warmer 0.5.doc
(20.5 KiB) Downloaded 338 times
rodos1979
Posts: 736
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Greece

Post by rodos1979 »

I think you have to calibrate it like that:
- lower the "input gain" by 5dB
- calibrate the "output gain", so that when you feed a 0dB signal, the output doesnt distort, and the perceived level (RMS avg) is the same
User avatar
Shroomz~>
Posts: 5669
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: The Blue Shadows

Post by Shroomz~> »

Rodos, I can't thank you enough. That's some clinical tests you've done there, thanks! They match up very closely to what I have here, which is that I made the mistake of adding 5 dB to the output gain when I was tired at 6am (ish) in the morning.

I will update the warmer :)

...but sussing out the basic phase issues & workarounds is my current passtime & it's not a FUN one, I can tell you :cool:
dawman
Posts: 14368
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: PROJECT WINDOW

Post by dawman »

Stay strong, Brotha' Man Shroomz.
User avatar
Tau
Posts: 793
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Portugal
Contact:

Post by Tau »

Shroomz,

This is really good!

Many many thanks!
User avatar
Shroomz~>
Posts: 5669
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: The Blue Shadows

Post by Shroomz~> »

Should we make a version of this as a modular module?
JLS
Posts: 663
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Czech
Contact:

Post by JLS »

YES YES YES

Very THANKS :-)
User avatar
Ben Walker
Posts: 824
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Contact:

Post by Ben Walker »

Shroomz wrote:Should we make a version of this as a modular module?
Pleeeez?
User avatar
Shroomz~>
Posts: 5669
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: The Blue Shadows

Post by Shroomz~> »

Ok then :)

edit --- it's still not quite finished, but here's a link to the modular version of this for future reference >>>
http://www.planetz.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=21363
dawman
Posts: 14368
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: PROJECT WINDOW

Post by dawman »

After thorough testing w/ my rig I decided for live keyboards that this version w/ all the filter options is perfect to use in the insert rack of FX in Solaris. On every preset I have custom Tube Filter Presets stored. I.E.....Oberheim XPander Strings are so FAT the HP filter works much better than using an equaliser to cut the lows. Zarg synths are now the ultimate, as they have ECC83S, Springtime, and SpaceF's delay sitting in the rack for every preset.

Thanks Sharc / Shroomz, Mehdi, Alfonso, and John Bowen,
User avatar
Shroomz~>
Posts: 5669
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: The Blue Shadows

Post by Shroomz~> »

Update !! - latest public beta version (v0.7)
-added presets ('Tube Filter.pre' file included in download at the top of page 1)

regards,
Shroomz
dawman
Posts: 14368
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: PROJECT WINDOW

Post by dawman »

Thank You Brotha' Man Shroomz,
I like this filter very much. It works great on samples, and synths as well. The filter options, and resonance add alot of versatility. Could you make it as big as my LCD screen ? ....just kiddin'.



JV
voidar
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Norway

Post by voidar »

Wasn't there a mono version aswell?
User avatar
Shroomz~>
Posts: 5669
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: The Blue Shadows

Post by Shroomz~> »

Yes, there was a mono version. It's still available in the 0.5 download. We'll post a mono version with presets at some point in the next few days.

cheers!! :)
Shroomz
Post Reply