Scope Users Community
https://scopeusers.com/forums/
Why don't you ask the proprietors yourself instead of getting on here and telling people what you don't know about, all the while trying to put dirt on so-called newbies.garyb wrote:as to asio 2.2, if there is currently no 64bit version, then...
there WILL be a 64 bit version as long as S/C remains in business, however.
yes, you are being willfully ignorant. is this a race to see who "appears" to be most friendly, or do you want to know about a great product? if Scope isn't right for you, then by all means, don't buy it!ristof wrote:As I said, tc now appear to be listening and more importantly liaising with customers, something obviously SC have always done but the point is for me at least that for all intents and purposes SC people may as well be on another planet.iSiStOy wrote:And what do you think they'll put into some powercore as an asio driver, if they ever give a try to an "all included" system?
Do you get it yet hint *Z*.
Personally I think at the end of the day, people like you are bad for SC and are more a part of the problem rather than any solution going forward, as the horizon for what can be achieved is skewed towards a particular way of thinking but maybe again you could blame SC and call it yet another failure for allowing such monsters as yourself to grow and take over the userbase with your ill-conceived notions of how things should be done and used.garyb wrote:yes, you are being willfully ignorant. is this a race to see who "appears" to be most friendly, or do you want to know about a great product? if Scope isn't right for you, then by all means, don't buy it!
What's funny is that you are quick to attack and conjecture without consideration of what recommendations have been offered.ristof wrote:Personally I think at the end of the day, people like you are bad for SC and are more a part of the problem rather than any solution going forward, as the horizon for what can be achieved is skewed towards a particular way of thinking but maybe again you could blame SC and call it yet another failure for allowing such monsters as yourself to grow and take over the userbase with your ill-conceived notions of how things should be done and used.garyb wrote:yes, you are being willfully ignorant. is this a race to see who "appears" to be most friendly, or do you want to know about a great product? if Scope isn't right for you, then by all means, don't buy it!
OK, so you have the option of using XTC/VSTim mode in your host/DAW for loading Scope effects, etc. - or you can route out of your host to the 'external' effects, synths, etc. in Scope. The routing flexibility is the power of Scope (distinct from what UAD and the others offer as just plugins).ristof wrote:Ok so now that is out of the way....
From where I sit (manufacturers aside) I am a sound designer, so firstly I need either samples and/or synthesis algorithms, how the sounds are reproduced in the end is not of concern in the first instance.
Secondly, I need a system that can run my DAW applications, while transparently allowing me to use both native and DSP based instruments and effects, whether from SC or not.
So my questions naturally will be from the point of view of the former, so if anyone can help it would be appreciated, otherwise don't sit there and say what is better when I've got full ASIO 2.2 supporting hardware and don't need native mode in order to continue my work which is music composition and NOT recording (yet).
but does it support VST 2.4 can anyone tell me that? Well , excuse me, ARC. But weren't you were the one who started this whole trainwreck thread off. You know, the "its time for scope 64bit and multi-asio" thread.ARCADIOS wrote:to be honest i am already getting tired of this nonstop race for getting the most recent software.
good things never end, I posted the auction of the 58 Fender P-Bass not so unintentionally...ARCADIOS wrote:.... but sometimes i wish it was 15 years back when i used to record on a tape a part that i liked on a vynil..... and by using pause and rec..and pause ...
trilian with another hungry vst(ivory) together..........works only if we bypass the 32bit limit.
i would prefer real bass and real piano of course
BUT...
That´s no posible, people can´t live without that working? That´s why they have no making good music for the last 20 years!!!siriusbliss wrote:Even Spectrasonics/Omnisphere won't be releasing 64-bit compatibility until next month (I saw it at NAMM), and there are some reports that people are having problems with Kontakt in 64-bit mode.dtb wrote:I 'd like to have a 64bit-scope-driver asap just because of some toys I currently use (such as omnisphere, bfd2, trillian, rmx, kontakt, amplitube ...) and I like 'em - so I simply need to adress more ram. that's my request.
Due to system limitations I've used vst system link, fxteleport in the past... but imo it makes things more complicated and isn't an alternative for me anymore.
if someone doesn't "need" omnisphere & co - that's OK for me. most of the time I use Scope only as my IN/OUT midi/audio-interface (and - what a shame - XTC mode). I rarely use the scope synths ... but that's me ... each to his own ...
just my 2c
tom
These things take time. 64-bit will come 'soon'.
Greg
I think your anger have more relation with the Bilderberg group than with SC. "Try before you buy" is not posible in hardware.ristof wrote:Thank you.Fluxpod wrote:Where are you located?
My country is not of concern right now, but what is of concern I believe is that the company that *was* servicing SC customers was put in an extremely difficult position by not being able to access product spares.
This is unacceptable to me as a customer and makes the product inaccessible, not to mention shockingly high prices which I attribute to a bad marketing strategy which at the end of the day hurts everyone, however there is room to change, look at tc electronic, now they are engaging customers on their online forum and actually informing of their plans (not to say SC don't) which is a paradigm shift in the way the company works.
In Sonic Cores' case, they need to assign more representatives to more countries in order to make their product more accessible to the masses and not just those who are endeared to the platform.
Evidence?? ..................Ladies & Gentlemen,.............Inspector Cluoseau.ristof wrote:You know I've been watching this forum for a long time and anytime anyone hints at using the gear solely in XTC mode they are immediately informed as to the contrary.
This is an open forum, people should not have to be brow beaten into a particular way of thinking, that one way is "better" than another.
The evidence is clear that garyb whoever he is has vested interest regardless of how much he helps people which I'm sure he does just like the dude on studionu
to be honest there's just too much evidence for a fake personalitystardust wrote:Ristof ...Be assured there are more Zs like you that do not care more for a quick discount and a goofy self display than for a good workflow, an elaborated device and a sustainable platform evolution.
The real contributors are not the loudmouths patronizing you here but the almost silent listeners and dedicated SDK developers.
Good to see though that once in a while someone is speaking up and puts some straight thoughts.
This has been the case on Z for a long time...