Digital audio Soft > a new development company

MCCY · Post by **MCCY** » Mon May 15, 2006 4:23 am

Could you add a deesser/dynaEQ with sidechain input?
I'm waiting for a good deesser for so long now...

By the way: Has this question been posted before?

Are new dsp-atoms used for sound of EQs in this devices? Where has been used 'own' atoms, where has been used creamware stuff?
To me it seems the sound is very close to the creamware stuff + adding some 'moving' EQs...

Martin

MD69 · Post by **MD69** » Mon May 15, 2006 5:02 am

Hi,

I don't think there is any new atoms as there is no new DSP files!

Cheers

digitalaudiosoft · Post by **digitalaudiosoft** » Mon May 15, 2006 5:04 am

support only by mail...

musurgio · Post by **musurgio** » Mon May 15, 2006 6:32 am

Hi,
I tried the 1084Eq and 550Eq , they really are a class of their own.
They give a certain quality ,other sound, to anything thru them.
I really like those !!
The reverb is astounding tyoo.
It reminds the AMS-16 that was used for drums a lot !
Thanks for your effort guys !!!
Regards,
Dimitrios

digitalaudiosoft · Post by **digitalaudiosoft** » Mon May 15, 2006 6:52 am

On 2006-05-15 07:32, musurgio wrote:
Hi,
I tried the 1084Eq and 550Eq , they really are a class of their own.
They give a certain quality ,other sound, to anything thru them.
I really like those !!
The reverb is astounding tyoo.
It reminds the AMS-16 that was used for drums a lot !
Thanks for your effort guys !!!
Regards,
Dimitrios

hi dimitrios,

rmx160 ...when i became a sound engineer ,there is now about 25 years ,AMS rmx 16 was my favorite reverb and lexicon of course...idem for api,pultec, and neve... my first big console before the ssl4000.

ev
________________
http://www.digitalaudiosoft.com

[ This Message was edited by: digitalaudiosoft on 2006-05-15 07:59 ]

Warp69 · Post by **Warp69** » Mon May 15, 2006 12:38 pm

Hi,

Some nice plugins.

But I do have a question about the RMX160.

Is it an emulation of the AMS RMX-16? If so, which algorithm?

Kind regards

Shayne White · Post by **Shayne White** » Mon May 15, 2006 1:19 pm

On 2006-05-15 05:23, MCCYRANO wrote:
By the way: Has this question been posted before?

Are new dsp-atoms used for sound of EQs in this devices? Where has been used 'own' atoms, where has been used creamware stuff?
To me it seems the sound is very close to the creamware stuff + adding some 'moving' EQs...

Martin

I don't think anybody has done custom atoms except Timeworks (the original set) and DSPDev. Flexor set a trend for building custom algorithms with math modules, which is what I think people are now doing who know how to program...don't ask me how it works, but it does seem to work! (Did Brainworx use custom atoms built with VisualDSP++? Probably not, but perhaps Dirk can correct me.)

Shayne

digitalaudiosoft · Post by **digitalaudiosoft** » Mon May 15, 2006 9:44 pm

support only by mail...

digitalaudiosoft · Post by **digitalaudiosoft** » Mon May 15, 2006 9:47 pm

I think people are now doing who know how to program...don't ask me how it works, but it does seem to work!
Shayne

Thank you for our community

ev

_________________
http://www.digitalaudiosoft.com

[ This Message was edited by: digitalaudiosoft on 2006-05-15 22:48 ]

MaoMusique · Post by **MaoMusique** » Mon May 15, 2006 11:54 pm

And only by module ?
Just POLTEQ = € ?
Just SL9000 = € ?

astroman · Post by **astroman** » Tue May 16, 2006 12:59 am

-

[ This Message was edited by: astroman on 2006-08-16 11:47 ]

Shroomz~> · Post by **Shroomz~>** » Tue May 16, 2006 2:07 am

So these are new circuits built with the most basic of math modules or atoms, but not new atoms & the assumption is that bx-digital was built in a similar fashion?

Not so sure about the brainworx bx, as when we first installed the oxe we got 2 error messages regarding missing dsp files before it loaded without a registration request string page. Although, that doesn't necessarily mean that the dsp files were actually missing & new ... go figure

Customer friendly prices & Great work ev !!

Best of luck with your new company !!

cheers
Shroomz

erminardi · Post by **erminardi** » Tue May 16, 2006 4:21 am

The interface of M/S EQ at 95% of actual dimension could be more compatible with 1024x768 pixel video standard. I think that's a easy to do (but I'm not in SDK knowledge) and rilevant for the overall usability. Thanks.
And the "insert text value" via keyboard coul be another serious improvement in a precision mastering purpose plugin...

ps. Yes, I still use the 1024x768 resolution (in my second PC) and I'm not alone...

[ This Message was edited by: erminardi on 2006-05-16 05:24 ]

steffensen · Post by **steffensen** » Tue May 16, 2006 5:10 am

On 2006-05-16 00:54, MaoMusique wrote:
And only by module ?
Just POLTEQ = € ?
Just SL9000 = € ?

bumpetibump.

MCCY · Post by **MCCY** » Tue May 16, 2006 5:48 am

I don't think anybody has done custom atoms except Timeworks (the original set) and DSPDev. Flexor set a trend for building custom algorithms with math modules, which is what I think people are now doing who know how to program...don't ask me how it works, but it does seem to work! (Did Brainworx use custom atoms built with VisualDSP++? Probably not, but perhaps Dirk can correct me.)

Shayne

Concerning the EQs of the BX:
I managed to delete signal with a cremwarEQ and inverted signal in most settings. You have to use two BX-digital for that: one with EQ-setting one without, both with just the mono-signal enabled. The one without EQ-settings goes through creamwareEQ and is inverted in the mixer (I used just one channel) I send both through Phasefix. I had to tweak the sample delay (something around 7) and the sound disappeared when setting the right EQ-settings in creamwareEQ (the bandwith differs a bit from BX).

So for me it is proven, that for the EQs the 'normal' creamware EQs are used.
For some reason it sounds different to MS-EQ (I haven't tried to eliminate MS-EQ EQ-settings so far...)

Martin

[ This Message was edited by: MCCYRANO on 2006-05-16 06:49 ]

MCCY · Post by **MCCY** » Tue May 16, 2006 5:58 am

hi,

try the sl9000
now ,you can have a good deeser
here is the algo of the sl9000
choose dynsc or split+sc button
for a good mastering too

or choose the para4dyn or the m/seq of course

ev

I'd like to have a dynamic EQ, which is controlled by sidechain, not a compressor controlled via sidechain! I don't like deessers which compress the whole frequency spectrum...

Martin

MD69 · Post by **MD69** » Tue May 16, 2006 8:00 am

Hi,

Maybe the "vintage" look is misleading, but the sound is very nice and operation of Polteq is a no brainer.

The "vintage" trend put more constraints on the developper as he have to duplicate every operational details of the original as well as to emulate the sound "fingerprint". Personnaly, I would rather like to have a "cambridge" GUI as I better see what happend (maybe a .... Proteq).

I don't have UAD plug to compare pultec pro to polteq, but maybe "inspired by" would better fit in polteq case.

which doesn't diminish its intrinsic value!

cheers

Warp69 · Post by **Warp69** » Tue May 16, 2006 12:16 pm

On 2006-05-15 22:44, digitalaudiosoft wrote:
the only thing i say ,is that i love ams rmx-16...maybe i am nostalgic of a certain time

I also think the AMS RMX-16 is awesome - especially the Ambience algorithm - very nice on vocals and drums. The Nonlin1+2 are also cool, but very '80ish.

I think the Lex 224 is alot better, when we talk about Hall a1, Plate a1 or Plat b1.

Kind regards

ARCADIOS · Post by **ARCADIOS** » Tue May 16, 2006 1:21 pm

hi guys!
haven't read much about them but i suppose that i already have enough.
i have spent about 4000 euros for my creamware hardware and software and i do not know if i need more plugins.
i bet that they are of great quality, but these days i try to learn how to use the ones i already have + tones of others(non-creamware).
i think that i need more time to work with the ones i have in order to get atleast more than 50% of them.
more plugs would give some kind of headache.

sonolive · Post by **sonolive** » Wed May 17, 2006 12:18 am

hi all, and thaks for all your support,

We are working on the payment system via paypal, the prices and order forms will be soon online,

Cheers,
olive