Page 13 of 21
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 4:18 am
by next to nothing
just do the oldest trick in the book and call it Flexor Studio or similar

Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 4:56 am
by Immanuel
Go for 3. It will be a fun bit of history
A Danish Comedy duo made 2 movies in the late 80s early 90s (?). They called the first one 'Jyde Compagniet' and the second one 'Jyde Compagniet 3' ... because the follow up version 2 of movies usually is a disappointment.
2.5 will be stranger than 3.
Also 3 will put you in line with Creamware's Modular3 - don't be left behind in the number race

Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 5:02 am
by petal
Yeah that would be my suggestion too. Instead of a number find a good and well describing word for this release, like "Flexor Exceeded" or "Flexer Excess". Maybe you can spin a word from how this release came into excistance, like "Flexor Fellowship"
If you wanna stick to the numbering however, and Flexor 2 is not an option, I think Flexor 3 would be more appropriate than 2.5.
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 5:57 am
by kylie
if a number is desired, I'd still go with 2, unless you internally revisited v1.5 an upgrade that better would have earned a major release number. if so, then name it 3. but "Flexor Second Edition" would fit better, imho. I also though of Flexor NG (Next Generation) or even Flexor Reloaded...
-greetings, markus-
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:32 am
by pling
i'd go for Flexor2XT or Flexor 2XL
p.s: i use mod2 shell+mod3 modules, but why not mod3 shell
cheers timo
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:45 am
by decimator
I would go for Flexor 3 because of the numbers of modules piling up !!
In my opinion it would a little dumb for users to have the " Flexor whatever " to come and not Modular III modules to exploit it more thoroughly.
Now the Mod III shell ... NOOOOOOOO !!! ( and running away )
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:49 am
by hifiboom
I think a Flexor 3 would be okay, because there are 2 times as much devices than in Flexor 1,5.
and hey it comes with an fx shell....
So why only make a step of 0,5 for such a huge jump....
it is really a 3,5 step forward compared to Flexor 1.5
So you could esily call it Flexor 5, but that would be mad too....
I think a Flexor 3 is nice...
but at the end I really don`t care about the name.

Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:23 am
by faxinadu
ReD_MuZe wrote:we will release a modular shell as an insert device...
but i wasnt asking becouse of the shell but rather some of the modules in m3
great !!!!!! i have been hoping for such an option.
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:38 am
by sonicstrav
What about?
Super Flexor
Flexor Deluxe
Flexor Gold or Platinum
Mega Flexor
Flexor Ultimate
Flexor Plus
Flexor Supreme
Flexor Mammoth
Flexor Pro / Professional
v3 is ok but a bit boring and plain
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:53 am
by Shroomz~>
Mega Flexor sounds like a 'transformers' robot name.

Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:50 am
by hifiboom
Flexor - makes you hot

Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 11:10 am
by hifiboom
Flexor atoms
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 12:25 pm
by Lima
Flexor 3 is nice IMO. I like very much also Flexor2XL or Flexor PRO.
You can also mind a name that has the number of module included, something like "Flexor 140" or so...
Another nice name that gets the idea could be "Flexor Modular Heaven"
and why not "Supersonic Flexor" or [jokin mode on] "Flexor the Bomb"

[mode off]

Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 1:27 pm
by hifiboom
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 1:32 pm
by Shroomz~>
3 is the magic number

Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:22 pm
by valis
Thanks everyone

Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:19 pm
by Leper
Looks great Valis

Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:32 pm
by wayne
Flexor cubed - dig it !
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 11:04 pm
by steffensen
Sweet!
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 1:39 am
by hifiboom
kylie wrote:hifiboom wrote:You will need years to write that manual. lol
that means even more years for Flexor III to come...
-greetings, markus-
now it comes earlier than we thought !
