adern - what's up?

stw · Post by **stw** » Fri Jun 20, 2003 4:47 am

On 2003-06-19 10:03, Spirit wrote:
What a joy that would be ! The Mod-II/III sequencer modules are worse than useless.

The base level for simple pattern sequencers (now established for a couple of years!) is a mouse-drawable 32-step (minimum) pattern. This business of fiddling with a tiny slider and watching the note number in 16-steps is history - or should be.

Add a PatternSEQ module and you have a 512 step sequencer with named patterns. Thats not so bad.
In case of a pitchSEQ it's easier for me to direct set the values than using any slider or mouse drawing.
In case of a controlerSEQ you're certainly right. That could benefit from a "drawing" feature.

Regards, Stefan

roy thinnes · Post by **roy thinnes** » Sun Jun 22, 2003 6:56 pm

june 23rd - there is something going on at the adern website...not really much, but you can see pics of the modules at least...

valis · Post by **valis** » Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:57 am

Sometimes things that you wait for really are worth it

roy thinnes · Post by **roy thinnes** » Sat Sep 20, 2003 8:52 am

ok,it's here now.Will download the demo version tonite

braincell · Post by **braincell** » Sun Sep 21, 2003 7:23 pm

On 2003-06-19 10:03, Spirit wrote:
What a joy that would be ! The Mod-II/III sequencer modules are worse than useless.

I agree they need improvement but I was thinking maybe there is a groove to them you can't get any other way. They also are soft wired. This means in theory you can do things with them that you could do with no other software sequencer. I agree they are tedious to use as is the STS GUI. The SFP in general takes a lot of time and dexterity.

braincell · Post by **braincell** » Mon Sep 22, 2003 11:27 pm

I just started using the modular sequencers and I like them.