Fluxpod wrote:The ammount of ignorance and biased oppinions is reaching critical levels..
Xite is a pro product= No money no game.A Pt Hd 3 rig is around 10 K ...
Vsti s dont have to sound bad.Absynth/reaktor...and so on.
Yes scope synths are really good sounding in their own way but they are not the end of the road in the digital world and itb!
Some people need to raise their horizont a little.

no offense.
seriously I think I can do everything all that 1000 vst can do in scope at least in same and in most cases in better quality.
I found myself getting better results the more I limit myself to a few tools.
To me scope scope has the far better reverbs compared to native.
far better sounding synths.
and more analog sounding filters, like interpole
and even the basic modular filter sounds somehow more analog than any native highend modelling filter.
and as synths, filters and reverbs are the most critical things when it comes to emulation software, I feel more than satisfied with just the scope environment.
For sure some little things could be improved:
- like the sampler series could get more intuitive.
- and some more and new atoms for the sdk would be great:
sound mangling, phase distortion, better pitch shifting, interpolated shapers, wavetable tools and so on....
but the basic structure and overall sound in scope is just perfect.
If SC plan to work on the synth and fx devices after the release of the XITE-1 and the solaris project with JB I think they got a bright and great future.