Hmm, sooo...what does the "No" refer to exactly? You don't suggest to get a Luna? Having read what I've read, I must say that I like the low latency ASIO in HW. So the issue is to have only 3 DSP and that Z-link instead of ADAT versus 4 DSP with ADAT.No.So you all suggest to start with the Luna card because of the smaller latency, or the Pulsar I because of more I/O and DSP? And which do you think has better software to start?
The second gen boards , regardless if 3,6 or 14 DSPs have ASIO in HW i.e. low latency feature.
That will boost your 1st gen pulsar to lower latencies when cascading with STDM connector(s).
Certainly also DSP power and I/O add.
Aparently there is no difference in the software packs, unless it's a new card right? I'm not really thinking about any ADAT or Z-link connections in the forseeable future, so the low latency as a standard does sound more appealing.
I did notice old Pulsar I cards usually have a ton of software packages (noticeable in other threads and the CW site), as they are usually the first bought and they have it all installed.
Is a Luna without any software besides SCOPE 4.0 Software and Scope Fusion Platform (are these two separate things?) a good start? And will it cost me alot to get the equal software the Pulsar I has separately? Someone just posted in another thread how they got a official upgrade for 192€ (Around a second hand Pulsar I price).
