Page 10 of 11
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 9:30 pm
by firubbi
braincell wrote:firubbi wrote:Thanks johnbowen.
braincell can you make a list that what you want from xite plz.
thanks
xite junior, for those not living off a trust fund.
braincell you just want a xite junior..thats it! i guess its the problem with the Price. hamm... 2800euro will be wroth if xite sounds better than our previous cards. what do you think?
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:29 pm
by wayne
husker wrote:
I happen to know there are 3 runway models who are regular contributors to planetz...can you guess who?
I'll have a go ..... Slammah, Garyb & Jimmy V ?
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:08 pm
by garyb
wayne, you're so modest...
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:22 pm
by firubbi
garyb you cross 10,000 post.
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:58 pm
by garyb
sorry...
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:09 am
by firubbi
don’t be… You won a xite

Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:08 am
by garyb
how do i collect?
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:59 am
by kylie
garyb wrote:
how do i collect?
pick one as soon as it enters your stock
congrats btw

Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:02 am
by garyb
thanks.
once again i've been confused with Thomann....

Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:35 am
by braincell
firubbi don't be silly. It's not going to sound better.
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:50 am
by Mr Arkadin
braincell wrote:The SFP suffers from tiny fake hardware syndrome. As an example, they wanted the Minimax to look like a Moog, so to get to the "extra" features, you have to click on an obscure button. Why not be able to see all the features at once?
Well just goes to show you can't please all the people all the time - i like the fact that it has the original interface because it's easy to program. Oh and that obscure button next to Main called Add isn't too hard to find now is it? Do you just like complaining for the sake of it.

Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 7:39 am
by braincell
Would it be more difficult for you to use if everything was visible at once?
The original hardware has knobs spaced a certain way because of physical imitations. You could probably design a GUI for the Minimax which uses 1/3 of the visual area and still be just as functional plus show all the controls at once. Seriously as long as the knobs are labeled you can use it. They could just as well be sliders as far as I'm concerned. Really now does having it look like a Moog help you to understand it? You know what ADSR, volume etc. is. How did you figure out the second window? That was not even on the original Moog. It's really very easy, you turn the knob and hear what it does.
What really blows with a lot of synthesizers is the effects suck so you have to always find where they are in the patches and turn them off. Down with extra clicking! I wish I could remove all effects from all the patches at once.
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:59 am
by Liquid Len
Jesus, please make me a leper again, but only part-time, so I can still beg!
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:09 am
by next to nothing
braincell wrote:Would it be more difficult for you to use if everything was visible at once?
yes.
braincell wrote: You could probably design a GUI for the Minimax which uses 1/3 of the visual area and still be just as functional plus show all the controls at once.
no.
braincell wrote:Really now does having it look like a Moog help you to understand it?
yes.
braincell wrote:You know what ADSR, volume etc. is. How did you figure out the second window? That was not even on the original Moog. It's really very easy, you turn the knob and hear what it does.
Space between knobs and an airy layout causs less strain during usage.
braincell wrote:What really blows with a lot of synthesizers is the effects suck so you have to always find where they are in the patches and turn them off. Down with extra clicking! I wish I could remove all effects from all the patches at once.
A one click for all effects would also affect chorus and flange, which again can take away a lot of what the sound is about. for most CW synths, turning off an effect is a question of 2 mouse cliks. tip: press "save" afterwards and you are fine.
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:38 pm
by okantah
What a hell ?
braincell can you keep us quiet here ?
if you complains contact S/C
if you are not satisfied with S/C go away please enough is enough
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:17 pm
by Mr Arkadin
next to nothing wrote:
braincell wrote:What really blows with a lot of synthesizers is the effects suck so you have to always find where they are in the patches and turn them off. Down with extra clicking! I wish I could remove all effects from all the patches at once.
A one click for all effects would also affect chorus and flange, which again can take away a lot of what the sound is about. for most CW synths, turning off an effect is a question of 2 mouse cliks. tip: press "save" afterwards and you are fine.
With Scope synths you don't even have to save them without effects, just hit the global effects off at the beginning of a session and leave off when you save the project. How many VSTis have a global effect off? But hey, i'm sure you'll find something to complain about with what i just said.
It seems to me that Scope has nothing you like - wrong type of PC connector, bad GUIs, bad customer service, bad marketing, bad DRM policy yadda yadda. i wonder why you stick with it? Most odd.
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:29 pm
by next to nothing
i though that as well, but didnt have the chance to check... i mostly pick a preset, tune it, and save it under some more conveniant name.
i guess i just gave braincell a new reason to complain. damnit.
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 9:07 pm
by firubbi
braincell wrote:firubbi don't be silly. It's not going to sound better.
how do you know?????
plz explain.
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 8:43 am
by Shroomz~>
next to nothing wrote:i guess i just gave braincell a new reason to complain. damnit.
Some people don't need a reason to complain around here. They'll complain
no matter what they have to work with. Very odd indeed.... oooo... my glass is half empty.
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:42 am
by braincell
Most people don't complain and that is why problems never seem to get fixed. An example is central air conditioning. In every house I have ever lived in, the central ac doesn't work well upstairs. Heat rises and there also is less air flow by the time the air gets to the ducts. It could be solved by technology. I have noticed a really strong inertia in technology. Computers get faster, but the creative aspect of software design, doesn't advance much. Everything Sonic Core is doing is based on what Creamware did many years ago. The x-ite is better hardware using exactly the same software they had before. It's easier to make things faster and perform better because it's something you can measure and you can always buy faster more powerful chips etc.. It's the creative aspect of software design that is more difficult. It's pretty easy to copy hardware. Making original software is more difficult because it takes imagination, it takes creativity. Business should be a joint venture. Ask customers what they want, address issues that bother people but if the customers don't speak up, obviously they won't have any input. If you can't use *all* bitrates in Cubase, then it will severely affect product sales in the future I will promise you. Putting the blame on Steinberg is idiotic because customers just want to use their stuff and don't care who is a fault! Grrrrr!
I'm ending all my posts with a smile because the person who insulted me did this. It's a great idea.

.