P4 32e oops

PC Configurations, motherboards, etc, etc

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
munch
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 4:00 pm

Post by munch »

I have just done some reading (on net and on planetz)and have not assembled my system yet. It seems that people are generally saying use the Pentium 3.2 and not the 3.2e(prescot vs northwood debates). I have purchased the 3.2e and am feeling a like a have made a bad choice. I have not opened the box yet so I might be able to exchange the 3.2e for a 3.2. I'm getting more nervous about this upgrade at the passing of each hour. please put my mind at rest and tell me the processor I have bought is going to be fine. thanks anyone for replies
AndreD
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: hamburg-audio.de
Contact:

Post by AndreD »

We have <b>no</b> problems with the prescott series!
(but no performance advantage)
munch
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 4:00 pm

Post by munch »

thank you. Thats all I wanted to hear.I really didn't expect to be this aprehensive about this upgrade!!!
User avatar
darkrezin
Posts: 2123
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: crackney

Post by darkrezin »

They run a bit hotter over here. Should be fine otherwise as far as P4's go.
munch
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 4:00 pm

Post by munch »

yeah I read about that today.....I might keep my new DAW in the fridge next to the beer.

The Zalman cooler looks good, but will stick with the provided Intel Heatsink for now.
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8446
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by astroman »

it's a real shame what Intel provides in the 'boxed' package :roll:

if silence is a concern check the mechanical connection of the cooler/fan construction.
I've replaced the Intel with a cheapo Arctic which is in fact less noisy due to slower rotation / larger fan, but the whole thing is resonating nicely on top of the metal parts.

cheers, Tom
munch
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 4:00 pm

Post by munch »

I will just have to find out how noisy the intel heatsink/fan is and wether it bothers me too much. Just nother thing.I'm not gonna use Thermal paste on the processor, just the pad. Do People here use thermal paste on their P4 processors?
AndreD
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: hamburg-audio.de
Contact:

Post by AndreD »

1. It <b>IS</b> noisy... :wink:
2. Depens on heatsink/fan manufacturer..

My recommendation:
http://www.arctic-cooling.com/en/
(cheap and soundless)


best,
andre

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: AndreD on 2004-05-23 13:19 ]</font>
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23364
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Post by garyb »

with the cooler that comes with the "boxed" processor,no paste is needed because there is a thermal substance on the cooler(don't scratch it).
User avatar
valis
Posts: 7650
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: West Coast USA
Contact:

Post by valis »

Just thought I'd add that the P4 line is pretty much dead as of next year...
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23364
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Post by garyb »

good point. the pcs made from them should work a litle longer though..
munch
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 4:00 pm

Post by munch »

P4 dead as of next year?. I was under the impression that the Prescott series was Intels plan ahead for the time being and the Intel 875p board will support the faster & faster chips?
User avatar
valis
Posts: 7650
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: West Coast USA
Contact:

Post by valis »

You're correct but the Prescott will be the LAST p4 core.
They have announced that they dropped all subsequent 'netburst' development and are switching over to focus on dual-core designs based on Centrino which is a continuation of the P6 (pentiumpro/PII/PIII) line.

http://www.planetz.com/forums/viewtopic ... forum=31&3
Post Reply