Simple stereo recorder?
There is a similar wish a bit below this topic. That kind of device would be like a gift from heaven. Even more if it had features like: 32-bit integer stereo/mono recording to hard disk, record/play/pause mode, time base counter, fast rewind/forward (all the usual stuff like in tape/DAT deck), low DSP usage.
My projects are usually so heavy that there is no room for hungry STS sampler anymore for simple recording purpose.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Stige on 2004-03-13 07:05 ]</font>
My projects are usually so heavy that there is no room for hungry STS sampler anymore for simple recording purpose.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Stige on 2004-03-13 07:05 ]</font>
I know it's nothing to do with SFP, but I always master into Steinberg Wavelab, just running it alongside Cubase & SFP, by plugging the master outs on the mixer to wave dest module.
Don't know if that's the kind of thing you mean, but it works a treat & keeps it all in the digital domain.
Of course, you can use any other digital editing software in the same way.
Don't know if that's the kind of thing you mean, but it works a treat & keeps it all in the digital domain.
Of course, you can use any other digital editing software in the same way.
Point taken, but you can get away with quite a lot by disabling all VUs in Scope, and the monitor in Wavelab, and compressing the arrange page in Cubase to prevent screen redraws.On 2004-03-13 13:24, eliam wrote:
The idea is not to master but to record the mixdown without taxing the cpu nor dsps. I wouldn't load wavelab when my cpu touches the 60%... On lighter projects this would be ok...
I've just thought.....I quite often record stuff back into Cubase anyway, especially if I'm applying FX or tweaking synths live etc.....
I always monitor via Control Room Outs on the STM 24/48, and by connecting the master outs to the ASIO Dest module, can capture whatever's unmuted in Scope.....no reason you couldn't do this for an entire mix I suppose? (admitedley I have got a faster computer now, but worth a try)
Also, check http://www.dancetech.com/aa_dt_new/index.cfm for links to loads of VST plugins, some of which you can use to insert anywhere in the chain to record WAV files (can't remember names, and I must admit, working this way I've never found need to try them), but if the cap fits......
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Plato on 2004-03-14 05:17 ]</font>
I always monitor via Control Room Outs on the STM 24/48, and by connecting the master outs to the ASIO Dest module, can capture whatever's unmuted in Scope.....no reason you couldn't do this for an entire mix I suppose? (admitedley I have got a faster computer now, but worth a try)
Also, check http://www.dancetech.com/aa_dt_new/index.cfm for links to loads of VST plugins, some of which you can use to insert anywhere in the chain to record WAV files (can't remember names, and I must admit, working this way I've never found need to try them), but if the cap fits......
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Plato on 2004-03-14 05:17 ]</font>
-
- Posts: 2310
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: Canada/France
-
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: Warsaw to Szczecin, Poland
- Contact:
I thought the point of eliam's post was to record 32bit integer while the TapeIt is 32 float. The SFP device (simple recorder) would be great for the above feature.
Besides, the TapeIt is PC only while the SFP device would be automaticaly dual platform, I presume.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: samplaire on 2004-03-16 03:47 ]</font>
Besides, the TapeIt is PC only while the SFP device would be automaticaly dual platform, I presume.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: samplaire on 2004-03-16 03:47 ]</font>
- cannonball
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: italia
-
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: Warsaw to Szczecin, Poland
- Contact:
VDAT isn't just a simple device. And it costs 249 Euros.
If for example I could afford VDAT I wouldn't use its 99% of features. It would be like using a laser to open a meat can.
_________________
Sir Sam Plaire Scopernicus
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: samplaire on 2004-03-17 04:13 ]</font>
If for example I could afford VDAT I wouldn't use its 99% of features. It would be like using a laser to open a meat can.
_________________
Sir Sam Plaire Scopernicus
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: samplaire on 2004-03-17 04:13 ]</font>
- cannonball
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: italia
Not only, you have to pre-allocate 8 tracks anyway, and you only have mono tracks, no stereo interleaved with VDAT..while sts3000 makes a stereo file.On 2004-03-17 06:19, wolf wrote:It would be like using a laser to open a meat can.
[/quote
.. at least the edges can't hurt then.
I must admit, i forgot the price ...
I would like it too...