Win XP - Home or Pro Edition?

PC Configurations, motherboards, etc, etc

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
deejaysly
Posts: 191
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: England

Post by deejaysly »

I'm thinking of taking the leap from Win 98SE to XP although i am a bit nervous about this one!

What version would you guys recommend...

Professional Edition or Home Edition?

Would the upgrade version be ok?

Will the Pro edition be more of a headache to setup?

Am i right in saying that they are both basically the same but the Pro edition is more tweakable?

I have no experience with XP but am pretty PC able.

You comments are greatly appreciated.
User avatar
bassdude
Posts: 1004
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ACT, Australia

Post by bassdude »

Do you want to run more than one CPU? If not get home otherwise get pro.
Micha
Posts: 471
Joined: Tue May 08, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Berlin
Contact:

Post by Micha »

Upgrade is ok.
IMHO Home is more of a headache.
Pro is easier to tweak.
User avatar
at0m
Posts: 4743
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bubble Metropolis
Contact:

Post by at0m »

Check out this topic, a while ago John Cooper was standing for the same choise...
more has been done with less
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
arela
Posts: 858
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Norway

Post by arela »

hi - My advise, NEVER upgrade OS
In my days, I have had so much trouble with upgrades.
1 year passes, and you want to change to a faster c: - you must first install old OS, then upgrade....
Or, virus...same story
:smile: buy a OEM XP (buy a HD to get it)
User avatar
Ricardo
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Just an Englishman in Oz

Post by Ricardo »

You can install XP Pro Upgrade as a stand alone. No need to install old OS first.
After using Win98, XP Pro upgrade will be a breeze. Do not fear. It is very easy to use, much more stable, and if you follow the install tips on this forum you'll never look back. Just keep it simple and junk free!! :smile:

_________________
Ricardo (of the Clan 'Ricardo')

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Ricardo on 2004-03-14 08:23 ]</font>
deejaysly
Posts: 191
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: England

Post by deejaysly »

People... Thank you.

Atomic: ...for the link. Had totally forgotten about it. I'm sold on XP Pro.

Ricardo: Heard that about the XP Pro upgrade to and thanks for the reassurance!

I love this place. Wouldn't know what I would do without it!
Plato
Posts: 463
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Plato »

I've set up systems on both home and pro, and found there to be no significant difference whatsoever, except pro burns a bigger hole in your pocket.
The only real difference I can see is that pro allows dual cpus, and may have a couple more services, but I tend to disable most of these anyway.
The biggest issue I've had with both is whether to install in ACPI mode or Standard PC. Both times I had to resort to the latter......although you get many more IRQ's with ACPI, I found SFP would just not work properly.....all sorts of timing errors etc.
I'd be interested to hear other people's experiences.
User avatar
ChrisWerner
Posts: 1738
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Germany/Bavaria
Contact:

Post by ChrisWerner »

XP pro with service pack one.
Works perfect.


_________________
Music starts where any language ends

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: ChrisWerner on 2004-03-15 06:51 ]</font>
deejaysly
Posts: 191
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: England

Post by deejaysly »

Chris: What mode is your perfectly working PC in? (ACPI or Standard)?
User avatar
Ricardo
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Just an Englishman in Oz

Post by Ricardo »

Don't know about Chris but I'm working perfectly with ACPI, and have also used Standard. I think it depends on your MoBo, anyone??
R
Plato
Posts: 463
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Plato »

What mobo's are you guys in ACPI mode using....mine is an Intel D865PERL: pretty recent/fast etc, but could not get my system settled at all without reinstalling XP in standard PC mode.....weird???
deejaysly
Posts: 191
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: England

Post by deejaysly »

Does anybody know the difference between the OEM and the upgrade versions of XP Pro?

I have heard that the upgrade comes with 3 CDs where the OEM version comes with something like 1 CD and also heard something about the OEM version not providing the option of formatting in FAT32 (as an option only!), things like that....

TIA
arela
Posts: 858
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Norway

Post by arela »

I have OEM, and there is option for FAT32.
My misliking of upgrade OS (and Office as well) goes back to WIN 3.1 and through ME
- but they might be more userfriendly now!

This PC (my surfer machine) has ME upgrade, and the job of reinstalling (after worm-atack) was #@$& (pronounce as you want)
.....(y, heard about BU)

My XP OEM came with PLUS on 1 CD.
I had to download Service pack1 (not sure)


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: arela on 2004-03-15 14:36 ]</font>
User avatar
kensuguro
Posts: 4434
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: BPM 60 to somewhere around 150
Contact:

Post by kensuguro »

A friend of mine recently bought an OEM XP pro bundled with a floppy drive. I think that's the cheapest combination. Still half price compared to the "boxed" version tho.

Also, you definitely need service pack 1. Especially if you have a 200gb+ harddisk. (I forgot what the exact limit was)

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: kensuguro on 2004-03-15 16:31 ]</font>
Post Reply