Noah for OSX!! (No, I'm not kidding...)

Planet Z Announcements

Moderators: valis, garyb

hubird

Post by hubird »

very interesting, Marcuspocus, Dark3zn.
so now we can say firewire is fast enough, but the conversion to PCI could be a problem.
I think I'm gonne ask the 'helpdesk' of a Mac computer magazin about it.
In the meantime, if someone knows more about it...
(I know there are external audiocardboxes with firewire, like M-Audio).
samplaire
Posts: 2464
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Warsaw to Szczecin, Poland
Contact:

Post by samplaire »

There is also TC Powercore FireWire. So firewire is good for audio (to be honest even USB is enough) but we are talking here about the translation 1:1 of PCI to firewire. I think CW should concentrate on new boards (or FW outboard boxes) rather than developing a translator. This would mean 2 translations in one system: the software (SFP) is PC core, translated to MacOS and then the dataflow from PCI to firewire and then again to PCI. Hmmm... this would be difficult :roll:
marcuspocus
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Canada/France

Post by marcuspocus »

Yes, even USB is useable, depends on what you need :

Look at this "MACKIE SPIKE XD2", they even have Sharc DSP inside this thing! :smile:

Personnaly, i would like a firewire box, packed with Sharc DSP + Lotsa RAM, plus ability to plug in the A16U or other 3rd party devices , like any mLan device for example. To add more io to the thing. All should be able to run in standalone mode, without any pc or mac.

Since PC & Mac always change, i won't buy no more PCI cards for now.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: marcuspocus on 2003-09-25 03:01 ]</font>
Counterparts
Posts: 1963
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Bath, England

Post by Counterparts »

dArKr3zIn wrote:

PCI is 133MB/sec :snip:
That's in its most basic form. There's also a specification for 64 bits wide, 66 MHz PCI (i.e. 4x the data rate). PCI-X takes things even further..! The Host Controller chips manage quite comfortably to convert between high-speed serial busses (USB2/firewire) & the PCI bus.

Note that PCI-X is in fact a *serial* bus! It's far easier to get a 1-bit wide bus going really bloody fast than have 8/16/32 bits arriving at the same place at exactly the same time... It presents itself as a 'parallel' bus (but isn't really). IIRC it is also backwards compatible with PCI.

Royston
mecanoiz
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2003 4:00 pm

Post by mecanoiz »

always thought that firewire is 400mbps which results in 50Mbyte/s.
8bits per byte
USB2 = 480mbps = 60 Mb/s
Firewire2= 800mbps should reach 100 Mb/s
Writing more than 40 Mb of audio data per second to hd would only be possible using many tracks / high resolutions / samplerates and a scsi or raid HD solution
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8446
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by astroman »

all those interface specs only tell you which date rate you cannot achieve - the one beyond specs.
It does not say how much of the theoretical bandwidth is usable in practical applications :grin:
Be very careful with your expectations under various wide spread OSes, as it's depending on driver code quality and interface specs, not only on chip design.

cheers, Tom
marcuspocus
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Canada/France

Post by marcuspocus »

I can at least be sure of one thing, my firewire interface transfer 18 channels IN and 18 channels OUT in 24@96 with no glitch whatsoever witha latency of 32samples...that's 3ms has gsif and multiclient asio/wdm.
User avatar
astroman
Posts: 8446
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Germany

Post by astroman »

tnx marcuspocus, that's exactly what I had in mind: real world data :grin:

cheers, Tom
mythalethe
Posts: 124
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: The Emerald City

Post by mythalethe »

hey marcuspocus:

is that interface a RME hammerfall?

-myth

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: mythalethe on 2004-01-02 18:33 ]</font>
marcuspocus
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Canada/France

Post by marcuspocus »

No, it's a tascam fw-1884

More than a converter
User avatar
Gordon Gekko
Posts: 1104
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: paname

Post by Gordon Gekko »

maybe OT: the magma box seems to be a good concept although as of now id rather play with a rackmounted pc loaded with powerpulsars, driven by a laptop through M$ terminal server... just a thought but you'd still have a box with your cards in it and a laptop :smile: ok the laptop srceen will refresh a bit slow but wtf, you can load the dsps without worries

anybody?
Post Reply