can you recommend pulsar 3.01 with winXP ???

helldriver · Post by **helldriver** » Sat Oct 12, 2002 6:56 am

I´m running win98 with Pulsar 3.01 with no problems and want go with winXP in the near future.
i don´t wanna upgrade to sfp yet (because of my projects). maybe I wanna install them together pulsar3.01 + sfp3.1c.
my question is:

is 3.01 running stable and without problems under winXP????

Spirit · Post by **Spirit** » Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:23 am

Moving from 98 to XPhome on 3.01 was the biggest stability improvement I've ever had with Pulsar.

Moving from 3.01 to 3.1 was the next best

. Things just "feel" solid now - or maybe I've just got over the jitters I use to have from getting base.dll crashes ...

Happily I haven't seen one of those in a loooooong time now.

braincell · Post by **braincell** » Sat Oct 12, 2002 8:48 am

It at least won't hurt provided you have a powerful enough computer.

helldriver · Post by **helldriver** » Sat Oct 12, 2002 11:39 am

is xp eating up more resources than win98se especially focused on cpu?
i have a p3 with 933mhz and 512mb ram.

Post by **garyb** » Sat Oct 12, 2002 12:51 pm

remove all non essential services and use 3.1c.it's good........

at0m · Post by **at0m** » Sat Oct 12, 2002 1:01 pm

Here's how little RAM XP can be set up to use:

Lotuz · Post by **Lotuz** » Sat Oct 12, 2002 5:53 pm

I had some problems with the Pulsar 3.0 software and Cubase SX (crackle when recording MIDI and/or audio) on WinXP, but SFP 3.1c fixed it. And I can set the latency than before.

helldriver · Post by **helldriver** » Sat Oct 12, 2002 8:03 pm

lotuz, did you have the problems with 3.01a or was it 3.0

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: helldriver on 2002-10-12 21:03 ]</font>

Lotuz · Post by **Lotuz** » Sun Oct 13, 2002 4:11 am

I'm not sure which version, but they both use the same drivers. So I think both versions will have the same problem with SX.