DUAL/SINGLE display video boards
Got 2 pc's with Matrox G450 Dualhead. Both have dual monitors.
Never had any problems with it, except for the initial time I had them. I liked to change display resolution, swap primary and secundary monitors etc etc and some programs would not be displayed properly. Now I rarely change the settings, and all works fine.
I'd not buy a G450 now, there's some more advanced models now. But I'd stick to Matrox.
Never had any problems with it, except for the initial time I had them. I liked to change display resolution, swap primary and secundary monitors etc etc and some programs would not be displayed properly. Now I rarely change the settings, and all works fine.
I'd not buy a G450 now, there's some more advanced models now. But I'd stick to Matrox.
more has been done with less
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
Went back to a matrox dual G450 16MB after using a whizz bang nvidia dual card (you don't need huge amounts of video ram). I like the image quality of the matrox better (it's the filter configuration they use not the voltage levels). Also I like how they have two vga output connectors, and you don't have to use adapters. Cheers!
Matrox G450 has 32MB RAM, not? Both of mine do.
more has been done with less
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
-
- Posts: 2310
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: Canada/France
If you have the money, i would buy the Matrox Parhelia... Next generation of Matrox Dualhead (triplehead in this case).
I've got a G450, before i had a MarvelG400(with tv in/out, hardware video compressor to record fullscreen video in realtime), before i had a MarvelG200. My next card will be a Matrox also. They have the best driver, stability and also the best image quality, specialy if you use DvD movies on your PC.
2D of Matrox is still the one to beat, but they're very poor in 3D. This is not a gamer card.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: marcuspocus on 2002-07-14 12:51 ]</font>
I've got a G450, before i had a MarvelG400(with tv in/out, hardware video compressor to record fullscreen video in realtime), before i had a MarvelG200. My next card will be a Matrox also. They have the best driver, stability and also the best image quality, specialy if you use DvD movies on your PC.
2D of Matrox is still the one to beat, but they're very poor in 3D. This is not a gamer card.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: marcuspocus on 2002-07-14 12:51 ]</font>
I own an AGP Ati Radeon VE, 32 MB and DualHead. THe ATI SUpport told me that Bus MAstering can´t be disabled for ATI Video Cards. I think that it´s not true, but that´s what they say, so think it twice before buying an ATI Video Card. Now I´d like to get a Matrox...
DJATWORK
DJATWORK
Luis Maria Gonzalez Lentijo
DjatWork! Optimizaciones
Buenos Aires
Argentina
DjatWork! Optimizaciones
Buenos Aires
Argentina
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: Terranova-Amsterdam
Spirit:
To Windows, you have only one desktop. IE: if you have two screens at 1024x768, windows sees this as a single desktop of 2048x768. It's your video driver that manages your screens.
The result is that, if you hit "print screen", you'll get a snapshot of your whole desktop(2048x768).
If you only want a snapshot of the active window, press ALT-Print Screen.
RedSun .:.
To Windows, you have only one desktop. IE: if you have two screens at 1024x768, windows sees this as a single desktop of 2048x768. It's your video driver that manages your screens.
The result is that, if you hit "print screen", you'll get a snapshot of your whole desktop(2048x768).
If you only want a snapshot of the active window, press ALT-Print Screen.
RedSun .:.
-
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Does this imply you need both screens running at the same resolution? I ask this because I plan to migrate from single to dual monitor setup. The main monitor is a viewsonic 19" which runs at 1600x1200, the secondary monitor (which is not connected now) is a compaq 17" which can only run at 1024x768. Is the effect dependent on the video board I choose?On 2002-09-02 16:09, RedSun wrote:
Spirit:
To Windows, you have only one desktop. IE: if you have two screens at 1024x768, windows sees this as a single desktop of 2048x768. It's your video driver that manages your screens.
Hope you can give me some clues. TIA
Rob
I'm running 3 x monitors, two on a Matrox G400max 32mb AGP and the 3rd on a 16mb TNT2 PCI. This works surprisingly well on an ASUS CUSL2-c mobo with a 1gig P3. I tend to run the Scope stuff on the 3rd monitor while Logic is across monitors 1 & 2. All 3 screens are 17 inch CRT's running at 1152*864.
The Parhelia looks very nice, but I'll wait for the price to drop before looking to get one......ditto with 17 inch LCD's..
The Parhelia looks very nice, but I'll wait for the price to drop before looking to get one......ditto with 17 inch LCD's..
