yes or no?
actually i have noticed that i load many of my modules without getting errors.
is it because i have a well setup pc and new os instalation, or because soniccore has worked on that aspect of better dsp loading proccess?
scope 5 dsp optimization
-
ARCADIOS
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 4:00 pm
- Location: Glyfada, Athens-Greece
- Contact:
-
garyb
- Moderator
- Posts: 23474
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
- Location: ghetto by the sea
Re: scope 5 dsp optimization
the latter...
-
voidar
- Posts: 1264
- Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: Norway
Re: scope 5 dsp optimization
Yup, I would have problems before with loading both a STW P100 and/or an A100/CD100. Not so with the SC versions. 
-
katano
- Posts: 1438
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 4:00 pm
- Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Re: scope 5 dsp optimization
maybe these are just the light versions?voidar wrote:Yup, I would have problems before with loading both a STW P100 and/or an A100/CD100. Not so with the SC versions.
but yes, dsp management seems to be better
-
Mr Arkadin
- Posts: 3283
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2001 4:00 pm
Re: scope 5 dsp optimization
Nope, they load the original presets, so they must be the same devices.katano wrote:
maybe these are just the light versions?