Cubase 4.1 Now With Side Chaining and More

Planet Z Announcements

Moderators: valis, garyb

User avatar
next to nothing
Posts: 2521
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Bergen, Norway

Post by next to nothing »

stardust wrote:that reminds me of the times when Reaktor 2.x came with that enigma file that just made it hard to copy and hack it. You needed 1 complete CD.
haha, i have that reaktor cd with the odd hole in it somewhere :D

cant remember if that was ver.1 or 2, but it was pretty hi tech :D
User avatar
braincell
Posts: 5943
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Washington DC

Post by braincell »

The Cubase 4.1 upgrade is a pain in the ass to install. You need to babysit it and it takes about 30 minutes and you need the original DVD.
User avatar
next to nothing
Posts: 2521
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Bergen, Norway

Post by next to nothing »

http://forum.cubase.net/phpbb2/viewtopi ... 058d4b54af

its still not fool proof either i guess :)

ah well, were drifting away here. ill shut up.
User avatar
next to nothing
Posts: 2521
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Bergen, Norway

Post by next to nothing »

damn i allways reply too soon braincell :D
User avatar
braincell
Posts: 5943
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Washington DC

Post by braincell »

The best feature I found so far is called "Free Warp". You can use the mouse to quickly stretch any section of a wav file. It seems nondestructive and is instant.
User avatar
kylie
Rank-o-phile
Posts: 2130
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Dresden / Germany

Post by kylie »

piddi wrote:haha, i have that reaktor cd with the odd hole in it somewhere :D

cant remember if that was ver.1 or 2, but it was pretty hi tech :D
I thought it was broken first, since I could not read it. then I realized while doing a hexdump that it was the mac os related cd... :D
it was v2.3, btw, and I even don't know why they drilled that hole, since they additionally protected the SW with the wibu dongle (much more convenient than the current challenge/response scheme, and even network aware)...

-greetings, markus-
--
I'm sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma.
User avatar
braincell
Posts: 5943
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Washington DC

Post by braincell »

Customer satisfaction is the most important thing and that sadly has taken a back seat to these crazy anti-piracy hoops they make you jump through. The software always gets cracked anyway. NI has unique products so maybe they can get away with it for now. The dongle can hold all the keys so cost per software would be low if you buy several of them.


Which reminds me; Steinberg has a new software to compete with Ableton Live. I didn't try the demo. It's good that they are paying attention to what is going on in the world of music tech. I tend to think that Yamaha doesn't have anything to do with them in terms of development. It's not like when Apple bought Emagic.
aallvor
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:00 pm

Post by aallvor »

I've never owned a sequencer app by any of the big guns, and I'm not sure if I want to either, after numerous horror stories throughout the years.

Smaller companies seem to be more grateful for the money their customers contribute, and not least, more receptive to user input :)
dawman
Posts: 14368
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: PROJECT WINDOW

Post by dawman »

EnergyXT sounds like a good one, and they respond to emails ?

What a concept.
aallvor
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:00 pm

Post by aallvor »

scope4live wrote:EnergyXT sounds like a good one, and they respond to emails ?

What a concept.
About e-mails; don't get me started on M-Audio :evil:

Their response is usual along the lines of; 'for further enquiries about our products, please contact your local distributor'...
User avatar
Mr Arkadin
Posts: 3283
Joined: Thu May 24, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Mr Arkadin »

braincell wrote:Hello.... did you hear Cubase 4.1 effects and synthesizers? If you haven't played with it, then you shouldn't be making that comment. I don't think you would be saying that if you did. To be fair Scope sounds different but lets face it, there hasn't been *any* development to the Scope platform in years and you guys are falling behind.
Yeah, all the development that occurred on Model-E, The Grand, Halion, the Palm thing etc. Steinberg update shit and i know it. They just change it every so often so that you buy a new version - not necessarily a better version. i still use VST32 (not for much longer) because of their shitty so-called 'upgrade' policy (hey where's the final release of VST32 we were promised?). At least Scope software has been downwardly compatible - not sure that they'll be able to do that if they ever go over to new Sharcs but it's been a good ride on this version.

Steinberg are hardly the most responsive company in the world - i've been with them since Pro24, but no more.
braincell wrote:Cubase won't even fit on a CD anymore.
:lol: Yes cause bigger is always better innit? :roll: i find Cubase a bloated fat bastard (and not in the good scope4live sense). Strip it to the essentials i want and it would probably fit on a floppy, but then it wouldn't have all the things you want, like Rewire (never use) etc. You can't please all the people all the time. You're the first person who has even suggested Scope having Rewire - do you think they're going to spend hours developing that for very little reward (i know no-one who uses it).

Anyway i can't see why you bash Scope - no system is an all-in-one. i know that's what the kiddiez want, but in reality music is made from disparate things coming together, otherwise we'd all sound like A.N.Other Cubase 4 track.
Last edited by Mr Arkadin on Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
braincell
Posts: 5943
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Washington DC

Post by braincell »

This thread is about Cubase 4.1 since so many of us use Cubase. You don't like the Cubase upgrade policy? This one is free. How do you like the Scope upgrade policy? As in:

NO UPGRADES!!!!
User avatar
Mr Arkadin
Posts: 3283
Joined: Thu May 24, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Mr Arkadin »

Well i upgraded from Pulsar 2.04 to 3.01 to 3.1c to 4.5. No upgrades? Really? OK some of them i paid a bit for for some extras, but there were unpaid options too (like to 4.0). ALL were downwardly compatible.

Steinberg upgrade policy: VST32 (don't get promised final version) to SX - paid upgrade. SX (don't get promised final version) to Cubase 4 - paid upgrade. How long before Cubase 4 is not upgradable in Steinberg's eyes and you have to pay for Cubase 5 (without them ever finishing Cubase 4 i assume)?

Oh and if you want to keep the thread about Cubase 4 then why do you bash Scope at every opportunity?
Last edited by Mr Arkadin on Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
hifiboom
Posts: 2057
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Germany, Munich
Contact:

Post by hifiboom »

well for me Steinberg was and is a midi sequencer till years...
And here it rules over all other sequencers, piano roll and mouse editing features are great implemented.

While I use it for audio these days too, I still think they never had a good hand at building plug-ins.

Their effects always sucked and so their synths too...

The roomworks is not directly a steinberg development, but its far from high-quality, although being better than their ealier Reverb A+B metal resonators.

The A1 was a waldorf development, but sounded more like waldorf have saved the good sounding stuff for their own hardware.

The other effects you have listed don`t impress me that much.

The Halion one is just a cut down halion sampler. nothing special...

the 3 other synths may just be attraction points to force existing steinberg users to upgrade to the new version.
The GUI seems nice, but in this case I am afraid that the same weak soundengines are working behind like in all other steinberg synth....

My opinion is: there are better things to spend your money on.

Question, why rave about this stuff? scope really has better things in every area, especially the synths are way way way better.
the fx too,
and well we got sidechaining...
Badger
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 4:00 pm

Post by Badger »

braincell wrote:This thread is about Cubase 4.1 since so many of us use Cubase. You don't like the Cubase upgrade policy? This one is free. How do you like the Scope upgrade policy? As in:

NO UPGRADES!!!!
You seem to be confusing the (now generally accepted) difference between software upGRADES and upDATES.

UpGRADES are usually charged for (and include new features - as well as (often as not) new bugs. Sometimes, existing features are even removed! :o

As you may know, the last "upgrade" to Cubase 4 actually removed Direct X support (without any prior warning from Steinberg), which rules it (and any subsequent updates) completely out of the question for me.

UpDATES (such as Cubase 4.1) are, of course, not "free" at all but included in the price of the "upgrade". This is normal practice. Updates are usually mainly bug-fixes with maybe a few minor improvements to the software.

One of the many problems with Steinberg as a company is that they offer remarkably few of these interim updates compared to other software companies (which would be fine if everything was reasonably bug-free and working properly in the first place, but invariably with Steinberg that is not the case - they are notorious for rushing the release of new versions).

Often, long standing bugs are even then not fixed before they expect users to buy the next "upgrade" - if I remember correctly, this has been the case with every Cubase version since at least VST 5 - and so it goes on until a sufficient number of users get wise to this game and refuse to pay for any new "upgrades" until they have a properly working current version (clearly, this hasn't yet happened!).

You are partially right about Scope though - although there have been both upgrades and updates in the past, there has been none for a long time now. But at least the system still generally works very well. Of course, it's also important to remember that a Scope package isn't just the software, we also have a great piece of hardware with on-board DSP, brilliant-sounding synths and sound processors together with a comprehensive I/O system too!

Regards,

Badger
arela
Posts: 858
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Norway

Post by arela »

I am a slow starter and installed Cubase 4.1 update yesterday.
I had it downloaded 2-3 weeks ago, but was watching from the sideline, since there seems to be some ASIO trouble.
My update was successful.................and as a bonus i think, i got 137% installed, verry impressive (now i understand why Steinberg programs are so expensive) - so i guess i'm up to Cubase 4.2 :D

Judging so far, the update is twice as good as the 4.0.
Why?
Some maths:
Yesterday - before update: 2 bluescreens - after: 1 bluescreen
2/1=2 :D
Badger
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 4:00 pm

Post by Badger »

arela wrote:...and as a bonus i think, i got 137% installed, verry impressive (now i understand why Steinberg programs are so expensive)
Blimey - sounds like Steinberg should make guitar amps then - they'd clean up if they applied that principle and made them all go up to 14! :D

Regards,

B
User avatar
braincell
Posts: 5943
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Washington DC

Post by braincell »

This should have been called a free update versus the last Scope upgrade which was more like an update since it really had nothing new in it except the inclusion of things they wanted us to buy.
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23364
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Post by garyb »

:) you are angry?
User avatar
braincell
Posts: 5943
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Washington DC

Post by braincell »

No, I'm very happy with the rapid improvement, low cost and ease of use of the SFP.
Post Reply