Bug in 31 band GraphEQ (mono version)?

An area for people to discuss Scope related problems, issues, etc.

Moderators: valis, garyb

Post Reply
Badger
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 4:00 pm

Bug in 31 band GraphEQ (mono version)?

Post by Badger »

Just emailed Ralf at Creamware about this, but in the meantime just wanted to check to see whether others can confirm, just in case it's a specific problem on my system (although this does seem unlikely as everything else is working fine):

In the mono version of the Graphic EQ, the Q control does not seem to be working correctly:

According to the manual, in both mono and stereo versions of the Graphic EQ, the Q frequency range should be continuously adjustable between 0.7 and 5.0 (and this works correctly in the stereo version).

However, in the mono version, the Q control only goes from 2.0 to 5.0. Double clicking the knob resets it at 2.9 (whereas in the stereo version it resets correctly at 2.0). I am not able to select values between 0.7 and 2.0 with the frequency range knob. However, double clicking in the numerical field does reset the range at 0.7 (but then turning the knob makes it immediately jump from 0.7 to 2.0 or above!).

Not a major deal, I know, but would be great if it were fixed.

Can anyone else confirm this?

Thanks.
hubird

Post by hubird »

you're right, same here!
a real bug! :-)
User avatar
Mr Arkadin
Posts: 3283
Joined: Thu May 24, 2001 4:00 pm

Post by Mr Arkadin »

Ha, never noticed that, prolly cos i tend to use the stereo version (which is rarely).
Badger
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 4:00 pm

Post by Badger »

Thanks for confirming this, guys. Then it looks as though it is indeed a bug. Hope it will be fixed in due course...

All the best.
psionic
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 4:00 pm

Post by psionic »

Hi, I found a lot of bugs in various modules, and the forum people told me to look out for alternatives... So - look out for an alternative :)
Badger
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 4:00 pm

Post by Badger »

Are you saying that a fix is not likely, then?
psionic
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 4:00 pm

Post by psionic »

Do you want me to count the actual bugs that have been confirmed here, with standard factory plugins - no 3rd party? They have been present since SFP3, and haven't been fixed 'till version 4.5 So - make a conclusion by yourself...

Cheerz
User avatar
at0m
Posts: 4743
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bubble Metropolis
Contact:

Post by at0m »

Hoi Badger,

Things don't get fixed that often, so don't get your hopes up too high. Of course, confirmation of a possible bug by other users filters out many other causes of the error, like a bad installation or a corrupt file or so. That confirmation, as you got in this topic, may save them some precious time...

Keep 'em coming,
at0m.
more has been done with less
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
Badger
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 4:00 pm

Post by Badger »

I see - didn't realise there were so many bugs. I suppose that perhaps Creamware could have lost many (all?) of their original development team during their rocky financial period. Since that came just after the version 3.1c release I suppose it would account for the lack of fixes since then...
User avatar
at0m
Posts: 4743
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bubble Metropolis
Contact:

Post by at0m »

That's one of the main reasons IMHO, that many of the original designers aren't around any more...
more has been done with less
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
psionic
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 4:00 pm

Post by psionic »

...and that ruins all the drivers / updates hope in the near future... :cry:
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23364
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Post by garyb »

wrong. there are coders at work as we speak........
User avatar
bassdude
Posts: 1004
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ACT, Australia

Post by bassdude »

Working on next gen Scope OS/PCI Express HW Gary?
Stuart.
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23364
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Post by garyb »

as to pci-e-
i don't know, but i wish they would. mackie style or similar automation too...

proper vista drivers for sure...
Badger
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 4:00 pm

Post by Badger »

garyb wrote:wrong. there are coders at work as we speak........
That's encouraging to hear - do you think they'll be up for fixing some of these (admittedly minor) things?
User avatar
garyb
Moderator
Posts: 23364
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: ghetto by the sea

Post by garyb »

maybe.
there is a lot of work to do. i'm not privy to the order of priority.
Lima
Posts: 917
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 4:00 pm
Location: Italy
Contact:

Post by Lima »

about saving time maybe could be useful to sum up those bugs in a dedicated topic; What do you think about this?
Welcome to the dawning of a new empire
Post Reply