Bug in 31 band GraphEQ (mono version)?
Bug in 31 band GraphEQ (mono version)?
Just emailed Ralf at Creamware about this, but in the meantime just wanted to check to see whether others can confirm, just in case it's a specific problem on my system (although this does seem unlikely as everything else is working fine):
In the mono version of the Graphic EQ, the Q control does not seem to be working correctly:
According to the manual, in both mono and stereo versions of the Graphic EQ, the Q frequency range should be continuously adjustable between 0.7 and 5.0 (and this works correctly in the stereo version).
However, in the mono version, the Q control only goes from 2.0 to 5.0. Double clicking the knob resets it at 2.9 (whereas in the stereo version it resets correctly at 2.0). I am not able to select values between 0.7 and 2.0 with the frequency range knob. However, double clicking in the numerical field does reset the range at 0.7 (but then turning the knob makes it immediately jump from 0.7 to 2.0 or above!).
Not a major deal, I know, but would be great if it were fixed.
Can anyone else confirm this?
Thanks.
In the mono version of the Graphic EQ, the Q control does not seem to be working correctly:
According to the manual, in both mono and stereo versions of the Graphic EQ, the Q frequency range should be continuously adjustable between 0.7 and 5.0 (and this works correctly in the stereo version).
However, in the mono version, the Q control only goes from 2.0 to 5.0. Double clicking the knob resets it at 2.9 (whereas in the stereo version it resets correctly at 2.0). I am not able to select values between 0.7 and 2.0 with the frequency range knob. However, double clicking in the numerical field does reset the range at 0.7 (but then turning the knob makes it immediately jump from 0.7 to 2.0 or above!).
Not a major deal, I know, but would be great if it were fixed.
Can anyone else confirm this?
Thanks.
- Mr Arkadin
- Posts: 3283
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2001 4:00 pm
Hoi Badger,
Things don't get fixed that often, so don't get your hopes up too high. Of course, confirmation of a possible bug by other users filters out many other causes of the error, like a bad installation or a corrupt file or so. That confirmation, as you got in this topic, may save them some precious time...
Keep 'em coming,
at0m.
Things don't get fixed that often, so don't get your hopes up too high. Of course, confirmation of a possible bug by other users filters out many other causes of the error, like a bad installation or a corrupt file or so. That confirmation, as you got in this topic, may save them some precious time...
Keep 'em coming,
at0m.
more has been done with less
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
That's one of the main reasons IMHO, that many of the original designers aren't around any more...
more has been done with less
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio