This probly doesnt belong to this thread, but anyway..
Flexor II Module Expectations
-
steffensen
- Posts: 311
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: Land of Polarbears
- Contact:
I would love to see emulations of all analog synths and presets for those of us who have run out of time to program everyday. I find that modular has such a precise and accurate emulation of filters and tape echos, etc. Basically tons of patches with presets for dissection and anyalzation. This is the best way for me to learn. I simply find what I like, and reverse engineer it according to my taste.
Great work Red_Muze. I havent yet bought Flexor but am now interested in v2. Will it include all past modules from 1, 1.5?
Who patented modelling? If you make up your own algorythms and call it something a bit different, who will stop you? But there are a lot of modelling devices out there besides Yamaha. What about Logic's Sculpture, 6 String, Synful Orchestra, Duendo, UAD-1.
I too wish for modelled osc if at all possible.
And for more analog modelled filters and distortions
The intelligent harmoniser/pitch quantiser is a great idea
All the other complicated ones look great too. But I chime in with scope4live in that more presets and devices for those not so technically minded would be nice.
One last wish...the CW shop sucks. It's always down. I wish we could just buy direct from you.
Who patented modelling? If you make up your own algorythms and call it something a bit different, who will stop you? But there are a lot of modelling devices out there besides Yamaha. What about Logic's Sculpture, 6 String, Synful Orchestra, Duendo, UAD-1.
I too wish for modelled osc if at all possible.
And for more analog modelled filters and distortions
The intelligent harmoniser/pitch quantiser is a great idea
All the other complicated ones look great too. But I chime in with scope4live in that more presets and devices for those not so technically minded would be nice.
One last wish...the CW shop sucks. It's always down. I wish we could just buy direct from you.
I would like a new NBL Saw 2 PWM !!!!
In the current one when PW is in neutral position you've got a perfect square up and down alternatively, fully left you've got a big rectangle up, fully right you've got a big rectangle down so both direction give the same result.
So I would like the PW to be unipolar.
At the lowest value you would have thin rectangle up ( spike of some samples ) then long baseline then thin rectangle down.
At max value, you would have what you have currently with the neutral PW position ( fullest square as possible )
An another idea for what's it's worth would be to have detachable bi-modules : one for wires ins, one for wires outs so the GUI would be less cluttered.
Each subunit would be numbered In 1 - Out 1 , In 2 - Out 2 etc ... to differentiate.
Mainly for non midi / gate signals.
In the current one when PW is in neutral position you've got a perfect square up and down alternatively, fully left you've got a big rectangle up, fully right you've got a big rectangle down so both direction give the same result.
So I would like the PW to be unipolar.
At the lowest value you would have thin rectangle up ( spike of some samples ) then long baseline then thin rectangle down.
At max value, you would have what you have currently with the neutral PW position ( fullest square as possible )
An another idea for what's it's worth would be to have detachable bi-modules : one for wires ins, one for wires outs so the GUI would be less cluttered.
Each subunit would be numbered In 1 - Out 1 , In 2 - Out 2 etc ... to differentiate.
Mainly for non midi / gate signals.
hopefully there will be tools to make sounds like this!
I found this to be extremly nice....and I couldn`t create something similar on any synth I had my hands on.... I`m only interested in that nice "wobbering" synth sound that cut off frequency is modulated...
If you carefully listen you`ll also notice some crushing distortion at the top range ( higher frequencies)
Although richen with something like phase/flanger -> delay -> reverb
I think this synth sound on its own (dry) is awesome, rich and has this "air" at the top range.......
what a great sound....
I hope to find some aggressive filters and extrmely richa and smooth distortions in Flexor II....
best regards
I found this to be extremly nice....and I couldn`t create something similar on any synth I had my hands on.... I`m only interested in that nice "wobbering" synth sound that cut off frequency is modulated...
If you carefully listen you`ll also notice some crushing distortion at the top range ( higher frequencies)
Although richen with something like phase/flanger -> delay -> reverb
I think this synth sound on its own (dry) is awesome, rich and has this "air" at the top range.......
what a great sound....
I hope to find some aggressive filters and extrmely richa and smooth distortions in Flexor II....
best regards
- Attachments
-
[The extension mp3 has been deactivated and can no longer be displayed.]
Last edited by hifiboom on Sun Dec 10, 2006 9:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
irrelevance
if I consider what 'sequencing' flexibility the 30 Euros for EnergyXT bought me, I don't even dare to bother Adern in that direction...
in loop sequencing it's Devine Machine
sequencing isn't Scope's strongest aspect, imho, possibly a consequence of the multi-platform GUI, but then... the Adern sound is unmatched, I just fill the control gaps via midi
cheers, Tom
in loop sequencing it's Devine Machine
sequencing isn't Scope's strongest aspect, imho, possibly a consequence of the multi-platform GUI, but then... the Adern sound is unmatched, I just fill the control gaps via midi
cheers, Tom
-
irrelevance
so didn't I ....
I meant just a handfull of midi notes and how I can shift, duplicate, transpose, select a subset etc while the thing loops through a few bars
you got to face what Scope is about - any All-In-One approach is bound to fail
it's ridiculuous to 'defend' a territory that's not even one's own, so to say... (though the latter seems to happen more often than appreciated... beyond the musical scope of this world... ouch)
anyway, Scope has good tools on board to load dsp code to chips and route a signal in the digital domain - it has barely nothing to offer for the GUI.
There is an 'interpreter' which is playing back movies when you move a virtual fader - and you can generate a significant system load with lots of that stuff running.
that's a natural matter of fact - it's the price you pay when you don't have to deal (as a developer) with a user interface on the level of the C++ buffer, structure, object, etc .
I'd rather like to see it differently, but there are limits with not even a chance to be overcome (imho), so I'd like to see them focus on what they can do best - and they ARE really good in that
cheers, Tom
I meant just a handfull of midi notes and how I can shift, duplicate, transpose, select a subset etc while the thing loops through a few bars
you got to face what Scope is about - any All-In-One approach is bound to fail
it's ridiculuous to 'defend' a territory that's not even one's own, so to say... (though the latter seems to happen more often than appreciated... beyond the musical scope of this world... ouch)
anyway, Scope has good tools on board to load dsp code to chips and route a signal in the digital domain - it has barely nothing to offer for the GUI.
There is an 'interpreter' which is playing back movies when you move a virtual fader - and you can generate a significant system load with lots of that stuff running.
that's a natural matter of fact - it's the price you pay when you don't have to deal (as a developer) with a user interface on the level of the C++ buffer, structure, object, etc .
I'd rather like to see it differently, but there are limits with not even a chance to be overcome (imho), so I'd like to see them focus on what they can do best - and they ARE really good in that
cheers, Tom
-
irrelevance
Well your arguement isn't wasted on me Tom but what I'm suggesting isn't so far from what is already offered.
Sequencers with more steps will equal more dsp and mabye larger screen space, and regarding having choice over input functionality, well this seems like a nice addition. I understand there may be a problem with non standard module sizes so mabye page viewing ie different views within the same module like Fra77z's DX module could be the awnser.
Sequencers with more steps will equal more dsp and mabye larger screen space, and regarding having choice over input functionality, well this seems like a nice addition. I understand there may be a problem with non standard module sizes so mabye page viewing ie different views within the same module like Fra77z's DX module could be the awnser.
i have just compiled a todo list out of your suggestions thank you very much for some great ideas.
flexor 2 tho has far beyond the requests here.
requests i will not follow :
1) combining several modules together
2) wraping creamware modules as is
3) devices that aleady exist exactly as i would do them
peace to all!
flexor 2 tho has far beyond the requests here.
requests i will not follow :
1) combining several modules together
2) wraping creamware modules as is
3) devices that aleady exist exactly as i would do them
peace to all!