DigitalAudioSoft - EQ Suite

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Sun Sep 24, 2006 1:58 pm

olive is right ,you are to stupid to talk with developpers.and i agree with him..

what a bunch of morons. hey einstein, while you were too busy studying the marvels of if thens, for loops and gotos, you missed your teacher explaining the following word meaning:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humility

Post by **hubird** » Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:05 pm

On 2006-09-24 14:58, legros wrote:
hey einstein,

eliam · Post by **eliam** » Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:20 pm

hifiboom · Post by **hifiboom** » Sun Sep 24, 2006 4:01 pm

On 2006-09-24 13:43, digitalaudiosoft wrote:
olive is right ,you are to stupid to talk with developpers.and i agree with him..
..and i'm stupid to answer those sh..t post too.

so now, you can say what you want...the only benefice is that everybody will see how stupid and jalous you are !

eric

sorry Eric,

but your arrogance and your narrow mind and the fact that you played with synthedit and CW SDK doesn`t make you a developer at all.

The DAS devices have a nice GUI, so congratulations to the grafic designer...
He did a nice job.

but combining some standard CW EQ Atoms and a well designed GUI doesn`t justify a price of 99€, maybe donationware.

Go back to synthedit and play with this. Its better.

You made a fool of yourself in this community.

On the other hand I m really enjoying every of your post:
In a funny way you are able to completly ignore a conversation...
Instead you are giving new assertions without fundamental substance.

[ This Message was edited by: hifiboom on 2006-09-24 17:51 ]

katano · Post by **katano** » Sun Sep 24, 2006 4:16 pm

is it time for another hug-thread now?

digitalaudiosoft · Post by **digitalaudiosoft** » Sun Sep 24, 2006 9:49 pm

hi all,

what are you proving ?
where is the phase meter ?
you are talking level not about phase ! so instead of wrtiing s...t post , you can begin to understand what are phase and level !

http://www.planetz.com/forums/viewtopic ... 5&start=20

eric

_________________
http://www.digitalaudiosoft.com

[ This Message was edited by: digitalaudiosoft on 2006-09-24 23:14 ]

digitalaudiosoft · Post by **digitalaudiosoft** » Sun Sep 24, 2006 9:57 pm

On 2006-09-24 14:58, legros wrote:
olive is right ,you are to stupid to talk with developpers.and i agree with him..

what a bunch of morons. hey einstein, while you were too busy studying the marvels of if thens, for loops and gotos, you missed your teacher explaining the following word meaning:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humility

maybe i'm einstein but you,who are you ? another stupid member ?you are 5 now on pz ! nice

you come here without testing and reading and you write s..t post on me !

here is a phase test ! this is a begining...

http://www.planetz.com/forums/viewtopic ... 5&start=20

so when all of you...arrogance newbie of this forum will understand that you can have phase with a signal below -160db for exemple ,all will be clear !

eric

_________________
http://www.digitalaudiosoft.com

[ This Message was edited by: digitalaudiosoft on 2006-09-24 23:58 ]

eliam · Post by **eliam** » Sun Sep 24, 2006 10:06 pm

digitalaudiosoft · Post by **digitalaudiosoft** » Sun Sep 24, 2006 10:10 pm

On 2006-08-11 08:17, hifiboom wrote:

I`ve done a small comparison between DAS N1084 and the URS Neve 1084 http://www.ursplugins.com/ursN.html

and I have to say that I like the DAS version more.
It sounds more like analog gear and more heavy.

On 2006-09-24 17:01, hifiboom wrote:

you played with synthedit and CW SDK doesn`t make you a developer at all.

and you hifiboom the winner here

!..what game are you playing baby ?

http://www.planetz.com/forums/viewtopic ... forum=5&19

you don't understand dbfs,don't understand how a noise gate works and you want to give me lessons ? are you stupid or crazy or better..?and yes..i have made plugs on synthedit and you ?...you are ridiculous !and yes i'm on creamware shop ! and you , you are plyaing with our demos versions...so ...
and when astroman has erased all his s...t post in another post, at the same moment,same minutes.. you have erased your rmx160 test...
very strange your attitude !
all the things you do are based on astroman post and attitude...strange again !very big personality !

it's like for scoopa2 and mccyrano !this scoopa2 created only for posting 2 s..t post on das !!! very nice attitude !!!

On 2006-07-08 10:18, scoopa2 wrote:

I'm 100% convinced a/b comparing Poltec to other creamware devices that in Poltec run some parametric creamware eqs. One should be able to phase-delete them, what could be a bit difficult if they use more than one eq-module.

same stupid test ,same sentence..
same ortograph fault : poltec instead of polteq ! mccyrano had never write it good

you are "minable" in french...

so ,prove that you are right , i want to see a phase cancellation instead of you s..t post !
olive has made test and he is right and only on 1 band activate so..!s..up !

http://www.planetz.com/forums/viewtopic ... 5&start=20

here is again !

On 2006-09-23 07:41, MCCYRANO wrote:
Ah, I see, I'm stupid !!!!!

not so far

I made your tests (first with a wave, then with a 1000 HZ sine, and also with a pink noise !!!)
I don’t own this master meter so i took a simple input meter of a « channel » device included in CW pack
, and i can say you i do not have the same results !!!

<IMG SRC="http://perso.orange.fr/p.f.records/PZ/PHCHK.jpg">

FIRST OF ALL : WHAT KIND OF SIGNAL DID YOU SEND IN THE WAVE SOURCE ? DO THIS SIGNAL CONTAINS 12000 HZ FREQ ? IF NOT, YOUR RESULT CAN’T BE GOOD !!! (UNDERSTAND ?)
MY SIGNAL IS A DRUMS SOLO DURING A LIVE SHOW, IT CONTAINS 12000 HZ BUT NOT SO MUCH ! TRY OUT WITH ANOTHER FREQ, RESULT WILL BE DIFFERENT ACCORDING TO YOUR SOURCE SIGNAL !

I don't know what is this "PHASE CHECK" you built but you will have to explain how it works !!! (or doesn't work !)
does it inverse a phase ? sum ?
it seems to invert one of the signal phase and sum them ? is it ? in that case , why a stereo output ?

SO , in order to proove your are completely « out »
I did my own tests !!! (can say you that i was sure of the results before doing them !!! ) but with real phase analysis tool, a phase meter ! ( the one of WAVE LAB passing thru wave dest )
And here are my conclusions , except the fact that i think you should take some hollydays right now, because you seem to be very tired !

Here are the screen shots of the tests, prooving that with the same settings, they are absolutely not in phase !!! WITH A PHASE METER ! OF COURSE ! MUCH MORE PRECISE THAN SUMMATION FOR PHASE CORRELATION (RIGHT ?)

SIGNAL USED IS A PINK NOISE AT -20Db FS

A – polteq at / +12 / 12000 HZ / Q =0.7 AND PEQ 4 SAME SETINGS, >> BUT ALL TWO BYPASSED !
<IMG SRC="http://perso.orange.fr/p.f.records/PZ/COFF.jpg">

WAVE DEST IS PLUGGED TO WAVE LAB INPUTS

RESULT :

<IMG SRC="http://perso.orange.fr/p.f.records/PZ/WLEQOFF.jpg">
absolute phase / NORMAL,

B – polteq at / +12 / 12000 HZ / Q =0.7 AND PEQ 4 SAME SETINGS, >> BUT ALL ACTIVE (NOT BYPASSED) !

<IMG SRC="http://perso.orange.fr/p.f.records/PZ/SFPON.jpg">

RESULT :

<IMG SRC="http://perso.orange.fr/p.f.records/PZ/WLEQON.jpg">

THIS IS NOT WHAT I CALL PHASED SIGNALS !!! DO YOU ?

SO MARTIN,

I don’t really know what is the aim of all these posts against our plugs ?

If you wanna compare phases, you should use preper tools : a phasemeter !!! coz levels and phases can be correlated but not necessary !!!

I hope you will try and build good (better) (sounding) plugs instead of trying to copy or attack other ones !
Cheers,
olive

and now ,we are in the begining of the story

eric

[ This Message was edited by: digitalaudiosoft on 2006-09-25 00:58 ]

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 12:22 am

maybe i'm einstein but you,who are you ? another stupid member ?you are 5 now on pz ! nice you come here without testing and reading and you write s..t post on me !

nah, it's like this: i'm another stupid potential customer that you just lost.. and i suspect we are not only five in here

good luck with your super cool sale policy i'll make sure no one i know buys your product.

[ This Message was edited by: legros on 2006-09-25 01:24 ]

digitalaudiosoft · Post by **digitalaudiosoft** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 12:42 am

On 2006-09-25 01:22, legros wrote:

nah, it's like this: i'm another stupid potential customer that you just lost.. and i suspect we are not only five in here

good luck with your super cool sale policy i'll make sure no one i know buys your product.

ok and what ? when a man try a plug he likes it,he needs it and he buy it ,not the developper who made them.. and we have sold lots of plugins,so who is wrong ? me ? no ,of course ! i don't want and i don't have to let bad members writing s...t post on my compagny.
it's like for microsoft, lots of people says bad things on it and they are using windows !

so ,are you saying that all our custumers are stupid ? i hope not !

they have good heard and they have studios and they work with them !

you are very ridiculous !

have you made the phase test? no ? so ...go on playing with your toys !anyway to write post like that , i think that you are not able to understand all what is writen here !

eric

and now ,i will answer all that kind of s...t post like that !

_________________
http://www.digitalaudiosoft.com

[ This Message was edited by: digitalaudiosoft on 2006-09-25 02:02 ]

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 12:59 am

pissing in my pants, standing up and applauding!! this is getting better than teevee

i only have one question left before you go on and continue amusing us here on planetz eric; how old are you?

digitalaudiosoft · Post by **digitalaudiosoft** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:07 am

legros...if you and your stupid friends wants only to write sh..t post, so here is the answer !and i will do that on each post now !

again and again...and again !

I made your tests (first with a wave, then with a 1000 HZ sine, and also with a pink noise !!!)
I don’t own this master meter so i took a simple input meter of a « channel » device included in CW pack
, and i can say you i do not have the same results !!!

<IMG SRC="http://perso.orange.fr/p.f.records/PZ/PHCHK.jpg">

FIRST OF ALL : WHAT KIND OF SIGNAL DID YOU SEND IN THE WAVE SOURCE ? DO THIS SIGNAL CONTAINS 12000 HZ FREQ ? IF NOT, YOUR RESULT CAN’T BE GOOD !!! (UNDERSTAND ?)
MY SIGNAL IS A DRUMS SOLO DURING A LIVE SHOW, IT CONTAINS 12000 HZ BUT NOT SO MUCH ! TRY OUT WITH ANOTHER FREQ, RESULT WILL BE DIFFERENT ACCORDING TO YOUR SOURCE SIGNAL !

I don't know what is this "PHASE CHECK" you built but you will have to explain how it works !!! (or doesn't work !)
does it inverse a phase ? sum ?
it seems to invert one of the signal phase and sum them ? is it ? in that case , why a stereo output ?

SO , in order to proove your are completely « out »
I did my own tests !!! (can say you that i was sure of the results before doing them !!! ) but with real phase analysis tool, a phase meter ! ( the one of WAVE LAB passing thru wave dest )
And here are my conclusions , except the fact that i think you should take some hollydays right now, because you seem to be very tired !

Here are the screen shots of the tests, prooving that with the same settings, they are absolutely not in phase !!! WITH A PHASE METER ! OF COURSE ! MUCH MORE PRECISE THAN SUMMATION FOR PHASE CORRELATION (RIGHT ?)

SIGNAL USED IS A PINK NOISE AT -20Db FS

A – polteq at / +12 / 12000 HZ / Q =0.7 AND PEQ 4 SAME SETINGS, >> BUT ALL TWO BYPASSED !
<IMG SRC="http://perso.orange.fr/p.f.records/PZ/COFF.jpg">

WAVE DEST IS PLUGGED TO WAVE LAB INPUTS

RESULT :

<IMG SRC="http://perso.orange.fr/p.f.records/PZ/WLEQOFF.jpg">
absolute phase / NORMAL,

B – polteq at / +12 / 12000 HZ / Q =0.7 AND PEQ 4 SAME SETINGS, >> BUT ALL ACTIVE (NOT BYPASSED) !

<IMG SRC="http://perso.orange.fr/p.f.records/PZ/SFPON.jpg">

RESULT :

<IMG SRC="http://perso.orange.fr/p.f.records/PZ/WLEQON.jpg">

THIS IS NOT WHAT I CALL PHASED SIGNALS !!! DO YOU ?

SO MARTIN,

I don’t really know what is the aim of all these posts against our plugs ?

If you wanna compare phases, you should use preper tools : a phasemeter !!! coz levels and phases can be correlated but not necessary !!!

I hope you will try and build good (better) (sounding) plugs instead of trying to copy or attack other ones !
Cheers,
olive

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:26 am

eric, calm down. I would love to make phase tests and see clear in this, but i fail to find that interesting. sorry. Hey maybe your product is the best who knows, i'm never going to test it. Why? well.. because you're a complete dick. sorry for saying. Why? because you fail to understand that a customer might not buy a product only for what it is. imagine walking into a dealer to buy a car and run into a salesman with your attitude..

scew that phase test, that is not why i stepped in here and called you a moron. i did it because i think your an arrogant, 15 year old egotistical maniac who thinks he is god and has no consideration for others.

there. fuck you and your little dawg

sonolive · Post by **sonolive** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:33 am

On 2006-09-25 02:26, legros wrote:
there. fuck you and your little dawg

i think you should at least stay polite legros !
cheers
olive

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:51 am

nah, i'm having way too much fun to be polite with your friend eric the dick

DSP ADD!CT · Post by **DSP ADD!CT** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:45 am

damn why didnt i see this thread earlier, f#@%^&*ng hilarious!

no disrespect to you olive but the way eric is reacting is far from polite. such a shame cause this will cost you potential customers. its better that you(olive) do the speaking for your products in the future imho.

cheers

DSP ADD!CT

hifiboom · Post by **hifiboom** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 3:22 am

Hahahaha, Eric.

I`m having to laugh out loud!!!!

(1) 0dbfs

Thats exactly what you don`t understand....

Thats why all your plug-ins are clipping without showing it on any LED. I told you that it is a bug. (and I told you 1000 times ... and its still there)

So either your english is very bad or you just don`t get it.

(2) Noise gate

nobody does know that your dynamics section on your reverb has to be a noise gate.
Like with many unprofessional tools there is no manual.

And as I told you: you mean "gate", not "noise gate". There is no noise in digital world....
I don`t understand, do you?

(3) yeah I put away the RMX information from my homepage. why?
Because it sounds shitty? NO. But because you are an aggressive intolerant id**t, and I won`t help you advertising anything in anyway.

So good bye Eric, try advertising your Synthedit VST reverbs...
at the end it seems like anybody can get into Creamware shop.

so have a nice day...

[ This Message was edited by: hifiboom on 2006-09-25 11:34 ]

MCCY · Post by **MCCY** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 3:27 am

darkrezin · Post by **darkrezin** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 4:24 am

Eric/Olive - think about this.. if someone was to buy your plugin, and then send a support email to you, would you answer in the same way? A developer who knows he has to sustain a business will react in a polite and good-natured way, no matter what the provocation.