i'm impressed.....
Thanks for the replies. I ordered this board based on AndreD's reply yesterday as I would really like to have it by this weekend...I'm a bit nervous now after garyb's report but I'm reassured that Andre has been running this extensively. I have a Scope card so I'll probably end up using slot3. I will be using a low-end graphics card w/o a fan, so I may experiment with using some very small fans to flush the heat from between the Scope card in slot1 and the graphics card. Even it slot3, it sounds like there is good stability. I'll let you know!
Cheers,
Cory
Cheers,
Cory
I'm a little bit nervous too - I would like to go for the P5WD2 - But I'm hesitating :
AndreD was going for dual core with 3 cards and it seems to work fine
thedavewalker with the same mb and cpu got some freezing and crash problems (2 cw cards + ...)
garyb tried the same mb but with a P4 640 and related some interesting things :
pci#3 : shares irq with sata controller
pci#2 : sata ports covered - badly positioned capacitor might keep a card from seating in the slot completely.
pci#1 very close to video slot (heat!)
AndreD, did you encounter any of this problems and if yes how did you resolve them ?
Are you using SATA drives ?
Thx
AndreD was going for dual core with 3 cards and it seems to work fine
thedavewalker with the same mb and cpu got some freezing and crash problems (2 cw cards + ...)
garyb tried the same mb but with a P4 640 and related some interesting things :
pci#3 : shares irq with sata controller
pci#2 : sata ports covered - badly positioned capacitor might keep a card from seating in the slot completely.
pci#1 very close to video slot (heat!)
AndreD, did you encounter any of this problems and if yes how did you resolve them ?
Are you using SATA drives ?
Thx
Thanks Garyb
But I have 2 cards, and certainely 3 in near future if the configuration that I will buy now seems to support it
This is why I'm looking for experiences with more than one card...
But I have 2 cards, and certainely 3 in near future if the configuration that I will buy now seems to support it
This is why I'm looking for experiences with more than one card...
_______________________________________
our music at http://algufr.bandcamp.com
and at http://alg95.bandcamp.com
more music at http://hurpasard.free.fr/index_en.html
our music at http://algufr.bandcamp.com
and at http://alg95.bandcamp.com
more music at http://hurpasard.free.fr/index_en.html
I'm now configuring & testing the new system:
asus p5wd2
4 GO Ram
P4 830
matrox perhelia
1 pata (system)
2 sata raid0 (music)
master verb pro test : the eleventh causes
"A capacity limit of your DSP cards has been reached ..."
I have 1 Pulsar2 and 1 SRB14
they are on IRQ 21 and 22 (not shared)
installation is not pc standard but acpi
What are the things I can try to get better results ?
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: gustav on 2006-01-25 18:36 ]</font>
asus p5wd2
4 GO Ram
P4 830
matrox perhelia
1 pata (system)
2 sata raid0 (music)
master verb pro test : the eleventh causes
"A capacity limit of your DSP cards has been reached ..."
I have 1 Pulsar2 and 1 SRB14
they are on IRQ 21 and 22 (not shared)
installation is not pc standard but acpi
What are the things I can try to get better results ?
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: gustav on 2006-01-25 18:36 ]</font>
what do you expect?On 2006-01-25 18:32, gustav wrote:
I'm now configuring & testing the new system:
asus p5wd2
4 GO Ram
P4 830
matrox perhelia
1 pata (system)
2 sata raid0 (music)
master verb pro test : the eleventh causes
"A capacity limit of your DSP cards has been reached ..."
I have 1 Pulsar2 and 1 SRB14
they are on IRQ 21 and 22 (not shared)
installation is not pc standard but acpi
What are the things I can try to get better results ?
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: gustav on 2006-01-25 18:36 ]</font>
This message is related to your Scope-Card, not to your PCI-bus...
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: AndreD on 2006-01-26 00:46 ]</font>
there is no such thing as a 'masterverb pro test.
the original 'test' uses the standard MV as a convenience 'unit' because almost everyone has it.
I assume 11 'pro' instances are pretty good (as Andre mentioned) - considering the DSP load of other quality reverbs.
but great PCI performance if the DSPs gave up earlier
cheers, Tom
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: astroman on 2006-01-26 01:00 ]</font>
the original 'test' uses the standard MV as a convenience 'unit' because almost everyone has it.
I assume 11 'pro' instances are pretty good (as Andre mentioned) - considering the DSP load of other quality reverbs.
but great PCI performance if the DSPs gave up earlier

cheers, Tom
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: astroman on 2006-01-26 01:00 ]</font>