Can anybody compare luna + i/o box with rme hamerfall hdsp 9632?
I don't want to start war between rme and creamware fans,I already have luna,I just need info on pros/coins of both systems.And can anybody tell me what is price of i/o box for luna,I can't find it anywhere.
Thanks,
best regards
Creamware vs RME
contact the sales department in Germany at info@creamware.de for pricing and shipping cost to where you are in Europe.
As noted the Scope Home + 2496 Box is listed on the creamware shop.
if you only want the box than a small email to the sales department will get you what you are looking for.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: antar on 2005-08-18 14:29 ]</font>
As noted the Scope Home + 2496 Box is listed on the creamware shop.
if you only want the box than a small email to the sales department will get you what you are looking for.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: antar on 2005-08-18 14:29 ]</font>
-
- Posts: 1963
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 4:00 pm
- Location: Bath, England
If I remember correctly, I was helping a friend look into some "problems" with the hammerfall. It was the only soundcard in his system and he wanted to be able to record VSTi's to hard disk, using Cubasis.
I looked into it for him and found that the hammefall doesn't have a "loopback port" so this is not possible. (I think that this is something that RME were looking at addressing in a future firmware release).
I think that the Creamware card would offer better routing possibilities, if that's something you need.
Royston
I looked into it for him and found that the hammefall doesn't have a "loopback port" so this is not possible. (I think that this is something that RME were looking at addressing in a future firmware release).
I think that the Creamware card would offer better routing possibilities, if that's something you need.
Royston
Royston - was it a hammerfall or a hammerfall DSP? The DSP cards have some routing possibilities, but it's nowhere near as flexible and easy to use as the Scope routing.
Doesn't Cubasis have some kind of bounce facility to record VSTi's to audio?
darkstar - For me, the pro's of an RME are that it can go down to slightly lower latency than CW, there's quite a lot of freedom with platform/OS (even runs on Linux) and generally very stable. Of course it won't do the cool things that are possible on a Scope system, but I'm not sure how much you can do with just 3 dsps (when I started out I just had a 4-dsp Pulsar I and it was fairly painful until I got another Pulsar I).
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: darkrezin on 2005-08-19 03:14 ]</font>
Doesn't Cubasis have some kind of bounce facility to record VSTi's to audio?
darkstar - For me, the pro's of an RME are that it can go down to slightly lower latency than CW, there's quite a lot of freedom with platform/OS (even runs on Linux) and generally very stable. Of course it won't do the cool things that are possible on a Scope system, but I'm not sure how much you can do with just 3 dsps (when I started out I just had a 4-dsp Pulsar I and it was fairly painful until I got another Pulsar I).
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: darkrezin on 2005-08-19 03:14 ]</font>
-
- Posts: 1963
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 4:00 pm
- Location: Bath, England
I think that it was the DSP variant. At the time, I did some hunting around on the RME website and found this:darkrezin wrote:
Royston - was it a hammerfall or a hammerfall DSP? The DSP cards have some routing possibilities, but it's nowhere near as flexible and easy to use as the Scope routing.
http://www.rme-audio.com/english/faq/rme_faq.htm
"Can signals be routed from output to input with Totalmix, for internal recording?
Not yet. Signals can be routed with a cable, e.g. from ADAT out to in (check the correct clock settings!) Internal routing will be added in a future driver release."
That has been there since the dinosaurs walked the Earth.
Not that I could discover. SX does it, I am pretty sure.Doesn't Cubasis have some kind of bounce facility to record VSTi's to audio?
Royston
The Luna2496 is unbalanced, so can't be compared to the RME really.
But if you go to A16... A/B'd A16 and Fireface here, and the difference is minimal, in favor of the RME - its noise floor for example is amazing. But the comparison turns to CW's benefit if you see the A16 has double the io's for only half the price...
But if you go to A16... A/B'd A16 and Fireface here, and the difference is minimal, in favor of the RME - its noise floor for example is amazing. But the comparison turns to CW's benefit if you see the A16 has double the io's for only half the price...
more has been done with less
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
https://soundcloud.com/at0m-studio
-
- Posts: 777
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: The Great White North
- Contact:
Noisefloor coming off my analog mixer with all faders open (except the crap sblive) is -85 to -90 dB, and that's the first 2 inputs to my RME Hammerfall (connected to HDSP pci card). The other 6 inputs are connected to my Virus and Fs1r and have -95 to -97 dB noisefloor. This is also an older Multiface with slightly less headroom than the Fireface and Multiface II that are shipping these days.
-
- Posts: 777
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 4:00 pm
- Location: The Great White North
- Contact: