## SEQUENCER

Device/Module Wishlist

Original topic on PlanetZ: https://forums.scopeusers.com/viewtopic.php?t=26638

#### SEQUENCER

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 7:29 am
by Rebu
New DAW based on scope dsp

#### Re: SEQUENCER

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 8:30 am
by Neutron
many functions of a sequencer such as midi processing, file handling and graphics display are better off left on the CPU.

#### Re: SEQUENCER

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 11:41 am
by Rebu
For now i work with Cubase but i try Reaper and i'm really impressed , Great seq. i think is my next daw
[many functions of a sequencer such as midi processing, file handling and graphics display are better off left on the CPU.]
..maybe, but if i write where Scope need improvment to go to next level i write this:
1- Stability (now i work fine but freeze problem not solved 100%)
2- Internal Seq.
3- Better support
IMO
P.S. maybe it's idea for another post: Write 3 area where you think scope need improvment to go to next level
P.P.S. sorry for English

#### Re: SEQUENCER

Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:33 pm
by dawman
Gine LBH VIII a look-see here.
http://www.spacef-devices.com/VIDEOS-B/ ... ercent.jpg

#### Re: SEQUENCER

Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 3:39 am
by astroman
there can never be an 'internal' sequencer because DSPs cannot handle file IO and all that stuff.
Btw half of Scope is running on the CPU anyway
cheers, Tom

#### Re: SEQUENCER

Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 9:53 am
by Rebu

> stardust wrote:In other words:
> Also ProTools has 'only' a native sequencer integrated with the DSP cards functions.
> I assume thats what was meant

Yes BINGO!! ..but only a dream

#### Re: SEQUENCER

Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 11:36 am
by iSiStOy
I own Cubase SX3: it's lot of work to really get proper hardware integration working into it. Only a small few devices are referenced in Midi machines. For the others you have that are not listed in stock presets, you're up for some painful Sysex programming!
I don't know about Cubase 4 however. I only heard rumours it's no better in 4.0.0 than in SX3.